10-Q: Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
Published on August 16, 2010
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010
Commission file number 1-13293
The Hillman Companies, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 23-2874736 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
10590 Hamilton Avenue Cincinnati, Ohio |
45231 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (513) 851-4900
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of Class |
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered |
|
11.6% Junior Subordinated Debentures | None | |
Preferred Securities Guaranty | None |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES x NO ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). YES ¨ NO ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer | ¨ | Accelerated filer | ¨ | |||
Non-accelerated filer | x (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company | ¨ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). YES ¨ NO x
On August 16, 2010, 5,000 shares of the Registrants common stock were issued and outstanding and 4,217,724 Trust Preferred Securities were issued and outstanding by the Hillman Group Capital Trust. The Trust Preferred Securities trade on the NYSE Amex under symbol HLM.Pr.
Table of Contents
THE HILLMAN COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION | PAGE(S) | |||
Item 1. | Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) | |||
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets | 3-4 | |||
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations | 5-6 | |||
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows | 7 | |||
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders Equity (Deficit) | 8 | |||
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements | 9-20 | |||
Item 2. | Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | 21-35 | ||
Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk | 36 | ||
Item 4. | Controls and Procedures | 36-37 | ||
Item 1. | Legal Proceedings | 38 | ||
Item 1A. | Risk Factors | 38 | ||
Item 2. | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds | 38 | ||
Item 3. | Defaults upon Senior Securities | 38 | ||
Item 4. | Reserved | 38 | ||
Item 5. | Other Information | 38 | ||
Item 6. | Exhibits | 38-39 | ||
40 |
Page 2
Table of Contents
THE HILLMAN COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(dollars in thousands)
Successor | Predecessor | |||||||
June 30, 2010 (Unaudited) |
December
31, 2009 |
|||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 9,631 | $ | 17,164 | ||||
Restricted investments |
334 | 334 | ||||||
Accounts receivable, net |
68,307 | 51,757 | ||||||
Inventories, net |
82,735 | 83,182 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes, net |
8,025 | 8,100 | ||||||
Other current assets |
3,322 | 2,657 | ||||||
Total current assets |
172,354 | 163,194 | ||||||
Property and equipment, net |
45,015 | 47,565 | ||||||
Goodwill |
472,207 | 257,806 | ||||||
Other intangibles, net |
300,866 | 146,640 | ||||||
Restricted investments |
2,694 | 2,709 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes, net |
349 | 418 | ||||||
Deferred financing fees, net |
15,657 | 5,690 | ||||||
Investment in trust common securities |
3,261 | 3,261 | ||||||
Other assets |
935 | 1,198 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 1,013,338 | $ | 628,481 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY (DEFICIT) | ||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 28,037 | $ | 19,191 | ||||
Current portion of senior term loans |
2,900 | 9,519 | ||||||
Current portion of capitalized lease and other obligations |
39 | 349 | ||||||
Accrued expenses: |
||||||||
Salaries and wages |
5,332 | 7,624 | ||||||
Pricing allowances |
5,625 | 5,317 | ||||||
Income and other taxes |
1,622 | 1,904 | ||||||
Interest |
1,854 | 2,199 | ||||||
Deferred compensation |
334 | 334 | ||||||
Other accrued expenses |
6,061 | 6,147 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
51,804 | 52,584 | ||||||
Long term senior term loans |
287,100 | 148,330 | ||||||
Long term capitalized lease and other obligations |
17 | 145 | ||||||
Long term senior notes |
150,000 | | ||||||
Long term unsecured subordinated notes |
| 49,820 | ||||||
Junior subordinated debentures |
116,050 | 115,716 | ||||||
Mandatorily redeemable preferred stock |
| 111,452 | ||||||
Management purchased preferred options |
| 6,617 | ||||||
Deferred compensation |
2,694 | 2,709 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes, net |
101,395 | 50,169 | ||||||
Accrued dividends on preferred stock |
| 75,580 | ||||||
Other non-current liabilities |
1,109 | 18,467 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
710,169 | 631,589 | ||||||
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Page 3
Table of Contents
THE HILLMAN COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(dollars in thousands)
Successor | Predecessor | |||||||||
June 30, 2010 (Unaudited) |
December 31, 2009 |
|||||||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY (DEFICIT) (CONTINUED) | ||||||||||
Common and preferred stock with put options: |
||||||||||
Class A Preferred stock, $.01 par, $1,000 liquidation value, 238,889 shares authorized, none issued and outstanding at December 31, 2009; zero authorized, issued and outstanding at June 30, 2010. |
| | ||||||||
Class A Common stock, $.01 par, 23,141 shares authorized, 395.7 issued and outstanding at December 31, 2009; zero authorized, issued and outstanding at June 30, 2010. |
| 2,158 | ||||||||
Class B Common stock, $.01 par, 2,500 shares authorized, 970.6 issued and outstanding at December 31, 2009; zero authorized, issued and outstanding at June 30, 2010. |
| 5,293 | ||||||||
Commitments and contingencies (Note 6) |
||||||||||
Stockholders' Equity (Deficit): |
||||||||||
Preferred Stock: |
||||||||||
Preferred stock, $.01 par, 5,000 shares authorized, none issued and outstanding at June 30, 2010. |
| | ||||||||
Class A Preferred stock, $.01 par, $1,000 liquidation value, 238,889 shares authorized, 82,104.8 issued and outstanding at December 31, 2009; zero authorized, issued and outstanding at June 30, 2010. |
| 1 | ||||||||
Common Stock: |
||||||||||
Common stock, $.01 par, 5,000 shares authorized, issued |
||||||||||
and outstanding at June 30, 2010. |
| | ||||||||
Class A Common stock, $.01 par, 23,141 shares authorized, 5,805.3 issued and outstanding at December 31, 2009; zero authorized, issued and outstanding at June 30, 2010. |
| | ||||||||
Class C Common stock, $.01 par, 30,109 shares authorized, 2,787.1 issued and outstanding at December 31, 2009; zero authorized, issued and outstanding at June 30, 2010. |
| | ||||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
308,641 | 10,302 | ||||||||
Accumulated deficit |
(5,470 | ) | (19,377 | ) | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
(2 | ) | (1,485 | ) | ||||||
Total stockholders' equity (deficit) |
303,169 | (10,559 | ) | |||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity (deficit) |
$ | 1,013,338 | $ | 628,481 | ||||||
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Page 4
Table of Contents
THE HILLMAN COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands)
Successor | Predecessor | |||||||||||||
One Month Ended June 30, 2010 |
Two Months Ended May 28, 2010 |
Three Months Ended June 30, 2009 |
||||||||||||
(As restated, see Note 2) |
||||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 47,700 | $ | 77,256 | $ | 123,813 | ||||||||
Cost of sales (exclusive of depreciation and |
||||||||||||||
amortization shown separately below) |
23,022 | 37,835 | 61,109 | |||||||||||
Gross profit |
24,678 | 39,421 | 62,704 | |||||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
14,299 | 42,562 | 40,276 | |||||||||||
Non-recurring expense (Note 14) |
10,403 | 11,311 | | |||||||||||
Depreciation |
1,522 | 2,993 | 4,214 | |||||||||||
Amortization |
1,009 | 1,071 | 1,809 | |||||||||||
Management and transaction fees to related party |
| 187 | 256 | |||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
27,233 | 58,124 | 46,555 | |||||||||||
Other (expense) income, net |
(136 | ) | (227 | ) | 166 | |||||||||
(Loss) income from operations |
(2,691 | ) | (18,930 | ) | 16,315 | |||||||||
Interest expense, net |
3,619 | 4,147 | 3,300 | |||||||||||
Interest expense on mandatorily redeemable |
||||||||||||||
preferred stock and management purchased options |
| 2,242 | 3,031 | |||||||||||
Interest expense on junior subordinated debentures |
1,051 | 2,102 | 3,272 | |||||||||||
Investment income on trust common securities |
(31 | ) | (63 | ) | (94 | ) | ||||||||
(Loss) income before income taxes |
(7,330 | ) | (27,358 | ) | 6,806 | |||||||||
Income tax (benefit) provision |
(1,860 | ) | (3,719 | ) | 4,453 | |||||||||
Net (loss) income |
$ | (5,470 | ) | $ | (23,639 | ) | $ | 2,353 | ||||||
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Page 5
Table of Contents
THE HILLMAN COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands)
Successor | Predecessor | |||||||||||||
One Month ended June 30, 2010 |
Five Months ended May 28, 2010 |
Six Months ended June 30, 2009 |
||||||||||||
(As restated, see Note 2) |
||||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 47,700 | $ | 185,716 | $ | 236,026 | ||||||||
Cost of sales (exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown separately below) |
23,022 | 89,773 | 119,385 | |||||||||||
Gross profit |
24,678 | 95,943 | 116,641 | |||||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
14,299 | 82,850 | 80,216 | |||||||||||
Non-recurring expense (Note 14) |
10,403 | 11,342 | | |||||||||||
Depreciation |
1,522 | 7,283 | 8,892 | |||||||||||
Amortization |
1,009 | 2,678 | 3,537 | |||||||||||
Management and transaction fees to related party |
| 438 | 509 | |||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
27,233 | 104,591 | 93,154 | |||||||||||
Other expense, net |
(136 | ) | (114 | ) | (467 | ) | ||||||||
(Loss) income from operations |
(2,691 | ) | (8,762 | ) | 23,020 | |||||||||
Interest expense, net |
3,619 | 8,327 | 7,128 | |||||||||||
Interest expense on mandatorily redeemable preferred stock and management purchased options |
| 5,488 | 5,949 | |||||||||||
Interest expense on junior subordinated debentures |
1,051 | 5,254 | 6,454 | |||||||||||
Investment income on trust common securities |
(31 | ) | (158 | ) | (189 | ) | ||||||||
(Loss) income before income taxes |
(7,330 | ) | (27,673 | ) | 3,678 | |||||||||
Income tax (benefit) provision |
(1,860 | ) | (2,465 | ) | 5,162 | |||||||||
Net loss |
$ | (5,470 | ) | $ | (25,208 | ) | $ | (1,484 | ) | |||||
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Page 6
Table of Contents
THE HILLMAN COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands)
Successor | Predecessor | |||||||||||||
One
Month Ended June 30, 2010 |
Five
Months Ended May 28, 2010 |
Six
Months Ended June 30, 2009 |
||||||||||||
(As restated, see Note 2) |
||||||||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||||||||
Net loss |
$ | (5,470 | ) | $ | (25,208 | ) | $ | (1,484 | ) | |||||
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash (used for) provided by operating activities: |
||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
2,531 | 9,961 | 12,429 | |||||||||||
Dispositions of property and equipment |
| 74 | 55 | |||||||||||
Deferred income tax provision (benefit) |
(1,930 | ) | (1,921 | ) | 4,226 | |||||||||
Deferred financing and original issue discount amortization |
172 | 515 | 507 | |||||||||||
Interest on mandatorily redeemable preferred stock and management purchased options |
|
|
|
|
5,488 |
|
|
5,949 |
|
|||||
Stock-based compensation expense |
| 19,053 | 3,800 | |||||||||||
Changes in operating items: |
||||||||||||||
(Increase) decrease in accounts receivable, net |
266 | (16,816 | ) | (15,061 | ) | |||||||||
(Increase) decrease in inventories, net |
(2,512 | ) | 2,959 | 13,426 | ||||||||||
(Increase) decrease in other assets |
(569 | ) | 124 | 703 | ||||||||||
Increase in accounts payable |
7,016 | 1,830 | 587 | |||||||||||
Increase in interest payable on junior subordinated debentures |
| | 6,265 | |||||||||||
(Decrease) increase in other accrued liabilities |
(6,582 | ) | 4,352 | 3,602 | ||||||||||
Other items, net |
(82 | ) | (894 | ) | (322 | ) | ||||||||
Net cash (used for) provided by operating activities |
(7,160 | ) | (483 | ) | 34,682 | |||||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||||||||
Payment for Quick Tag license |
(11,500 | ) | | | ||||||||||
Capital expenditures |
(1,349 | ) | (5,411 | ) | (5,347 | ) | ||||||||
Net cash used for investing activities |
(12,849 | ) | (5,411 | ) | (5,347 | ) | ||||||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||||||||
Borrowings of senior term loans |
290,000 | | | |||||||||||
Repayments of senior term loans |
(148,306 | ) | (9,544 | ) | (14,000 | ) | ||||||||
Borrowings of revolving credit loans |
600 | | | |||||||||||
Repayments of revolving credit loans |
(600 | ) | | | ||||||||||
Principal payments under capitalized lease obligations |
(6 | ) | (459 | ) | (223 | ) | ||||||||
Repayments of unsecured subordinated notes |
(49,820 | ) | | | ||||||||||
Borrowings of senior notes |
150,000 | | | |||||||||||
Financing fees, net |
(15,729 | ) | | | ||||||||||
Purchase predecessor equity securities |
(506,407 | ) | | | ||||||||||
Proceeds from sale of successor equity securities |
308,641 | | | |||||||||||
Borrowings under other credit obligations |
| | 468 | |||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities |
28,373 | (10,003 | ) | (13,755 | ) | |||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
8,364 | (15,897 | ) | 15,580 | ||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
1,267 | 17,164 | 7,133 | |||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 9,631 | $ | 1,267 | $ | 22,713 | ||||||||
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Page 7
Table of Contents
THE HILLMAN COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY (DEFICIT) (Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands)
Predecessor | Successor |
Additional Paid-in Capital |
Accumulated Deficit |
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss ) |
Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
Total Stockholders Equity |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common Stock |
Class
A Preferred Stock |
Common Stock |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A | Class C | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2009Predecessor |
$ | | $ | | $ | 1 | $ | | $ | 10,302 | $ | (19,377 | ) | $ | (1,485 | ) | $ | (10,559 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Net loss |
| | | | | (25,208 | ) | | $ | (25,208 | ) | (25,208 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Class A Common Stock FMV adjustment (2) |
| | | | (5,650 | ) | | | | (5,650 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends to shareholders |
| | | | (7,583 | ) | | | | (7,583 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Change in cumulative foreign translation adjustment (1) |
| | | | | | 17 | 17 | 17 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change in derivative security value (1) |
| | | | | | 1,161 | 1,161 | 1,161 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive loss |
$ | (24,030 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at May 28, 2010Predecessor |
| | 1 | | (2,931 | ) | (44,585 | ) | (307 | ) | (47,822 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Close Predecessors stockholders deficit at merger date |
| | (1 | ) | | 2,931 | 44,585 | 307 | 47,822 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of 5,000 shares of common stock |
| 308,641 | 308,641 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at May 28, 2010Successor |
| | | | 308,641 | | | 308,641 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss |
| | | | | (5,470 | ) | | $ | (5,470 | ) | (5,470 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Change in cumulative foreign translation adjustment (1) |
| | | | | | (2 | ) | (2 | ) | (2 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive loss |
$ | (5,472 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at June 30, 2010Successor |
$ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 308,641 | $ | (5,470 | ) | $ | (2 | ) | $ | 303,169 | |||||||||||||||
(1) | The cumulative foreign translation adjustment and change in derivative security value are net of taxes and represent the only items of other comprehensive income (loss). |
(2) | Management of the Predecessor Company controlled 395.7 shares of Class A common stock which contained a put feature that allowed redemption at the holders option. These shares were classified as temporary equity and were adjusted to fair value. See Note 10, Common and Preferred Stock, for further details. |
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Page 8
Table of Contents
THE HILLMAN COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(dollars in thousands)
1. Basis of Presentation:
The accompanying financial statements include the condensed consolidated accounts of The Hillman Companies, Inc. (Hillman Companies) and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (collectively Hillman or the Company). All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.
On May 28, 2010, Hillman Companies was acquired by an affiliate of Oak Hill Capital Partners (OHCP) and certain members of Hillmans management and Board of Directors. Pursuant to the terms and conditions of an Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of April 21, 2010, the Company was merged with an affiliate of OHCP with the Company surviving the merger (the Merger Transaction). As a result of the Merger Transaction, Hillman Companies is a wholly-owned subsidiary of OHCP HM Acquisition Corp. (Holdco). The total consideration paid in the Merger Transaction was $831.1 million which includes $11.5 million for the Quick Tag license and related patents, the repayment of outstanding debt and the net value of the Companys outstanding junior subordinated debentures ($105.4 million liquidation value at the time of the merger). The merger consideration is subject to certain post-closing working capital and other adjustments.
Prior to the Merger Transaction, affiliates of Code Hennessy & Simmons LLC (CHS) owned 49.3% of the Companys outstanding common stock and 54.6% of the Companys voting common stock, Ontario Teachers Pension Plan (OTPP) owned 28.0% of the Companys outstanding common stock and 31.0% of the Companys voting common stock and HarbourVest Partners VI (HarbourVest) owned 8.7% of the Companys outstanding common stock and 9.7% of the Companys voting common stock. Certain current and former members of management owned 13.7% of the Companys outstanding common stock and 4.4% of the Companys voting common stock.
The Companys condensed consolidated balance sheet as of May 28, 2010 and its related statements of operations, cash flows and changes in stockholders equity for the periods presented prior to May 28, 2010 are referenced herein as the predecessor financial statements (the Predecessor or Predecessor Financial Statements). The Companys condensed consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2010 and its related statements of operations, cash flows and changes in stockholders equity for the periods presented subsequent to the Merger Transaction are referenced herein as the successor financial statements (the Successor or Successor Financial Statements). The Predecessor Financial Statements do not reflect certain transaction amounts that were incurred at the close of the Merger Transaction. Such transaction amounts include the write-off of $5,010 in deferred financing fees associated with the Predecessor debt obligations.
The Successor Financial Statements reflect the preliminary allocation of the aggregate purchase price of $831.1 million, including the value of the Companys junior subordinated debentures, to the assets and liabilities of Hillman based on fair values at the date of the Merger Transaction in accordance with ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations. The Company is in the process of obtaining third-party valuations of certain assets acquired in connection with the Merger Transaction, including but not limited to customer relationships, patents, licenses, property and equipment, non-compete agreements and the corresponding impact of deferred income taxes. The Company is also in the process of finalizing its fair value evaluation of inventory. Thus, the allocation of the purchase price is subject to change. Any amounts attributable to such assets are expected to be finalized during 2010.
Page 9
Table of Contents
THE HILLMAN COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
(dollars in thousands)
1. Basis of Presentation (continued):
The Companys financial statements have been presented on the basis of push down accounting in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) American Standards Codification (ASC) 805-50-S99 (Prior authoritative literature: Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 54 Application of Push Down Basis of Accounting in Financial Statements of Subsidiaries Acquired by Purchase). FASB ASC 805-50-S99 states that the push down basis of accounting should be used in a purchase transaction in which the entity becomes wholly-owned by another entity. Under the push down basis of accounting, certain transactions incurred by the parent company which would otherwise be accounted for in the accounts of the parent are pushed down and recorded on the financial statements of the subsidiary. Accordingly, certain items resulting from the OHCP Merger Transaction have been recorded on the financial statements of the Company.
The following tables reconcile the fair value of the acquired assets and assumed liabilities to the total purchase price:
Amount | ||||
Cash paid as merger consideration |
$ | 714,200 | ||
Cash paid for Quick Tag license and related patents |
11,500 | |||
Fair value of consideration transferred |
$ | 725,700 | ||
Cash |
$ | 1,267 | ||
Accounts Receivable, net |
68,573 | |||
Inventory, net |
80,223 | |||
Other current assets |
11,775 | |||
Property and equipment |
45,407 | |||
Goodwill |
472,207 | |||
Intangible assets |
301,875 | |||
Other non-current assets |
3,671 | |||
Total assets acquired |
984,998 | |||
Less: |
||||
Accounts payable |
(21,021 | ) | ||
Deferred income taxes |
(103,681 | ) | ||
Junior subordinated debentures |
(105,446 | ) | ||
Junior subordinated debentures premium |
(7,378 | ) | ||
Other liabilities assumed |
(21,772 | ) | ||
Net assets acquired |
$ | 725,700 | ||
The following table indicates the pro forma financial statements of the Company for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 (including non-recurring charges of $21,745 as discussed in Note 14). The pro forma financial statements give effect to the Merger Transaction as if it had occurred on January 1, 2010 and January 1, 2009, respectively.
Three Months Ended June 30, 2010 |
Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 |
Three Months Ended June 30, 2009 |
Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 |
||||||||
Net Sales |
124,956 | 233,416 | 123,813 | 236,026 | |||||||
Net Income (Loss) |
(16,938 | ) | (17,736 | ) | 3,360 | (8 | ) |
Page 10
Table of Contents
THE HILLMAN COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
(dollars in thousands)
1. Basis of Presentation (continued):
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements present information in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and the instructions to Form 10-Q and applicable rules of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all information or footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. Management believes the financial statements include all normal recurring accrual adjustments necessary for a fair presentation. Operating results for the six month period ended June 30, 2010 do not necessarily indicate the results that may be expected for the full year. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company's annual report filed on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, as amended.
Nature of Operations:
The Company is one of the largest providers of value-added merchandising services and hardware-related products to retail markets in North America through its wholly-owned subsidiary, The Hillman Group, Inc. (Hillman Group). A subsidiary of Hillman Group operates in (1) Canada under the name The Hillman Group Canada, Ltd., (2) Mexico under the name SunSource Integrated Services de Mexico SA de CV, and (3) primarily in Florida under the name All Points Industries, Inc. (All Points). Hillman Group provides merchandising services and products such as fasteners and related hardware items; threaded rod and metal shapes; keys, key duplication systems and accessories; and identification items, such as tags and letters, numbers and signs to retail outlets, primarily hardware stores, home centers and mass merchants.
2. Restatement of Consolidated Financial Statements:
Subsequent to the issuance of the Companys December 31, 2009 consolidated financial statements, the Company concluded that certain of its accounting practices with respect to the income tax accounting for the Purchased Options and the Preferred Options were not in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. As more fully described in Note 10, Common and Preferred Stock, certain members of management were issued options to purchase shares of Hillman Companies Class A Preferred Stock and the Hillman Investment Company Class A Preferred Stock. Changes in the fair value of the Purchased Options were recognized as interest expense and changes in the fair value of the Preferred Options were recognized as compensation expense. For income tax reporting purposes, changes in the fair value of the Purchased Options and the Preferred Options were treated as permanent book versus tax timing differences and, therefore, no income tax benefit was recognized. Management has determined that, upon exercise, the difference between the redemption value and strike price of the Purchased Options and Preferred Options is deductible for federal and state income tax. Therefore, there should be a tax benefit reported in each period where compensation and interest expense was recognized for the change in the fair value of the Preferred Options and the Purchased Options. Additionally, a benefit should be recognized for the cumulative difference in the fair value and the strike price of the Purchased Options at the date of the acquisition of Hillman Companies by CHS, OTPP and HarbourVest in 2004.
Page 11
Table of Contents
THE HILLMAN COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
(dollars in thousands)
2. Restatement of Consolidated Financial Statements (continued):
As a result of the above, the Company restated its condensed consolidated statements of operations and cash flows for the three month and six month periods ended June 30, 2009. The following is a summary of the effects of these changes on the Companys condensed consolidated statements of operations and cash flows for the three month and six months ended June 30, 2009.
Predecessor |
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations | |||||||||
For the three months ended June 30, 2009: |
As Previously Reported |
Adjustments | As Restated | |||||||
Income tax provision |
$ | 4,886 | $ | (433 | ) | $ | 4,453 | |||
Net income |
1,920 | 433 | 2,353 |
Predecessor |
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations | |||||||||
For the six months ended June 30, 2009: |
As Previously Reported |
Adjustments | As Restated | |||||||
Income tax provision |
$ | 6,077 | $ | (915 | ) | $ | 5,162 | |||
Net loss |
2,399 | (915 | ) | 1,484 |
Predecessor |
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows | |||||||||
For the six months ended June 30, 2009: |
As Previously Reported |
Adjustments | As Restated | |||||||
Net loss |
$ | 2,399 | $ | (915 | ) | $ | 1,484 | |||
Deferred income tax provision |
5,141 | (915 | ) | 4,226 |
3. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies:
Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts:
The Company establishes the allowance for doubtful accounts using the specific identification method and also provides a reserve in the aggregate. The estimates for calculating the aggregate reserve are based on historical collection experience. Increases to the allowance for doubtful accounts result in a corresponding expense. The allowance for doubtful accounts was $522 at June 30, 2010 and $514 at December 31, 2009.
Shipping and Handling:
The costs incurred to ship product to customers, including freight and handling expenses, are included in selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses on the Companys statements of operations. The Successor shipping and handling costs included in SG&A were $1,999 for the one month period ended June 30, 2010. The Predecessor shipping and handling costs included in SG&A were $3,153 and $7,398 for the two and five month periods ended May 28, 2010, respectively. The Predecessor shipping and handling costs included in SG&A were $4,161 and $7,966 for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2009, respectively.
Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements:
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses for the reporting period. Actual results may differ from estimates.
Page 12
Table of Contents
THE HILLMAN COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
(dollars in thousands)
4. Recent Accounting Pronouncements:
In January 2010, the FASB issued guidance on fair value measurements disclosures. This guidance amends the ASC to require new disclosures for fair value measurements and provides clarification for existing disclosure requirements. The guidance requires new disclosures about transfers in and out of Levels 1 and 2 and further descriptions for the reasons for the transfers. The guidance also requires more detailed disclosure about the activity within Level 3 fair value measurements. The Company adopted the guidance on January 1, 2010, except for the requirements related to Level 3 disclosures, which will be effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2010. This guidance requires expanded disclosures only, and did not and is not expected to have a material impact on the Companys consolidated results of operations and financial condition.
In February 2010, the FASB made amendments to certain recognition and disclosure requirements concerning subsequent events. This update addresses the interaction of the requirements of the ASC with the SECs reporting requirements. The update requires an entity to evaluate subsequent events through the date that the financial statements are issued. The update also provides that a filer is not required to disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated. All the amendments in this update are effective upon issuance of the final update. The adoption of this amendment did not have a material impact on the Companys consolidated results of operations and financial conditions.
5. Other Intangibles, net:
The values assigned to intangible assets in connection with the Merger Transaction were determined by management through a preliminary independent appraisal. The intangible asset values may be adjusted by management for any changes determined upon completion of work on the independent appraisal. In connection with the Merger Transaction, the Company acquired the Quick Tag license for consideration amounting to $11,500. Other intangibles, net as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 consist of the following:
Estimated Useful Life (Years) |
Successor | Predecessor | ||||||
June 30, 2010 |
December 31, 2009 |
|||||||
Customer relationshipsHillman |
23 | $ | 199,093 | $ | 126,651 | |||
Customer relationshipsAll Points |
15 | | 555 | |||||
Trademarks |
Indefinite | 77,476 | 47,394 | |||||
Patents |
9 | 13,806 | 7,960 | |||||
Quick Tag license |
6 | 11,500 | | |||||
Non compete agreements |
4 | | 5,742 | |||||
Intangible assets, gross |
301,875 | 188,302 | ||||||
Less: Accumulated amortization |
1,009 | 41,662 | ||||||
Other intangibles, net |
$ | 300,866 | $ | 146,640 | ||||
Intangible assets are amortized over their useful lives. The Predecessors amortization expense for amortizable assets was $2,678 for the five months ended May 28, 2010 and was $3,537 for the six months ended June 30, 2009. The Successors amortization expense for amortizable assets for the one month ended June 30, 2010 was $1,009. The combination of the amortization expense for amortizable assets of the Successor and Predecessor for the year ended December 31, 2010 is estimated to be $9,740. For the years ended December 31, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, and 2015, the Successors amortization expense for amortizable assets is estimated to be $12,107, $12,107, $12,107 $12,107 and $12,107, respectively.
Page 13
Table of Contents
THE HILLMAN COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
(dollars in thousands)
6. Commitments and Contingencies:
The Company self insures its product liability, automotive, workers compensation and general liability losses up to $250 per occurrence. Catastrophic coverage has been purchased from third party insurers for occurrences in excess of $250 up to $35,000. The two risk areas involving the most significant accounting estimates are workers compensation and automotive liability. Actuarial valuations performed by the Companys outside risk insurance expert, Insurance Services Office, Inc., were used by management to form the basis for workers compensation and automotive liability loss reserves. The actuary contemplated the Companys specific loss history, actual claims reported, and industry trends among statistical and other factors to estimate the range of reserves required. Risk insurance reserves are comprised of specific reserves for individual claims and additional amounts expected for development of these claims, as well as for incurred but not yet reported claims. The Company believes the liability of approximately $1,842 recorded for such risk insurance reserves is adequate as of June 30, 2010, but due to judgments inherent in the reserve estimation process, it is possible the ultimate costs will differ from this estimate.
As of June 30, 2010, the Company has provided certain vendors and insurers letters of credit aggregating $5,487 related to its product purchases and insurance coverage of product liability, workers compensation and general liability.
The Company self-insures its group health claims up to an annual stop loss limit of $200 per participant. Aggregate coverage is maintained for annual group health insurance claims in excess of 125% of expected claims. Historical group insurance loss experience forms the basis for the recognition of group health insurance reserves. Provisions for losses expected under these programs are recorded based on an analysis of historical insurance claim data and certain actuarial assumptions. The Company believes the liability of approximately $1,729 recorded for such group health insurance reserves is adequate as of June 30, 2010, but due to judgments inherent in the reserve estimation process, it is possible the ultimate costs will differ from this estimate.
On May 4, 2010, Hy-Ko Products, Inc. filed a complaint against Hillman Group and Kaba Ilco Corp., a manufacturer of blank replacement keys, in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio Eastern Division, alleging that the defendants engaged in violations of federal and state antitrust laws regarding their business practices relating to automatic key machines and replacement keys. Hy-Ko Products May 4, 2010 filing against the Company is based, in part, on the Companys previously-filed claim against Hy-Ko Products alleging infringement of certain patents of the Company. The plaintiff is seeking unspecified monetary damages which would be trebled under the federal antitrust laws in the United States, interest and attorneys fees as well as injunctive relief. Because the lawsuit is in a preliminary stage, it is not yet possible to assess the impact that the lawsuit will have on the Company. However, the Company believes that it has meritorious defenses and intends to defend the lawsuit vigorously.
In addition, legal proceedings are pending which are either in the ordinary course of business or incidental to the Companys business. Those legal proceedings incidental to the business of the Company are generally not covered by insurance or other indemnity. In the opinion of management, the ultimate resolution of the pending litigation matters will not have a material adverse effect on the condensed consolidated financial position, operations or cash flows of the Company.
Page 14
Table of Contents
THE HILLMAN COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
(dollars in thousands)
7. Related Party Transactions:
The Predecessor was obligated to pay management fees to a subsidiary of CHS in the amount of $58 per month. The Predecessor was also obligated to pay transaction fees to a subsidiary of OTPP in the amount of $26 per month, plus out of pocket expenses. The Successor has no management fee charges for the one month period ended June 30, 2010. The Predecessor has recorded aggregate management and transaction fee charges and expenses from CHS and OTPP of $187 and $438 for the two and five month periods ended May 28, 2010, respectively. The Predecessor also recorded aggregate management and transaction fee charges and expenses from CHS and OTPP of $256 and $509 for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2009, respectively.
Gregory Mann and Gabrielle Mann are employed by All Points as President and Vice President, respectively. All Points leases an industrial warehouse and office facility from companies under the control of the Manns. The Predecessor and Successor have recorded rental expense for the lease of this facility on an arms length basis. The Successor recorded rental expense for the lease of this facility in the amount of $28 for the one month period ended June 30, 2010. The Predecessor recorded rental expense for the lease of this facility in the amount of $55 and $138 for the two and five month periods ended May 28, 2010, respectively. The Predecessor also recorded rental expense for the lease of this facility in the amount of $83 and $165 for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2009, respectively.
8. Income Taxes:
The Companys policy is to estimate income taxes for interim periods based on estimated annual effective tax rates. These are derived, in part, from expected pre-tax income. However, the income tax provision for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2010 have been computed on a discrete period basis. The Companys variability in income between quarters combined with the large permanent book versus tax differences and relatively low pre-tax income creates the inability to reliably estimate pre-tax income for the full fiscal year. Accordingly, the interim tax provision for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2010 were calculated by multiplying pre-tax earnings, adjusted for permanent book versus tax basis differences, by the statutory income tax rate.
In the second quarter of 2010, the Company recognized a $323 increase in valuation reserves recorded against certain deferred tax assets. This impacted the effective income tax rate from the federal statutory rate by -0.9% in the six month period ended June 30, 2010. Also in the second quarter of 2010, the Company recognized a $1,554 increase in its reserves for uncertainty in accounting for income taxes. This adjustment decreased the deferred tax asset related to the future tax benefit of the Companys net operating loss carryforward. This impacted the effective income tax rate from the federal statutory rate by -4.4% in the six month period ended June 30, 2010.
The effective income tax rates were 12.4% and 140.3% for the six month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. In addition to the effect of state taxes, the effective income tax rate differed from the federal statutory rate primarily due to the effect of nondeductible interest on mandatorily redeemable preferred stock and stock compensation expense.
Page 15
Table of Contents
THE HILLMAN COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
(dollars in thousands)
9. Long Term Debt:
On May 28, 2010, Hillman Companies and certain of its subsidiaries closed on a $320,000 senior secured first lien credit facility (the Senior Facilities), consisting of a $290,000 term loan and a $30,000 revolving credit facility (Revolver). The term loan portion of the Senior Facilities has a six year term and the Revolver has a five year term. The Senior Facilities provide borrowings at interest rates based on a EuroDollar rate plus a margin of 3.75% (the EuroDollar Margin), or a base rate (the Base Rate) plus a margin of 2.75% (the Base Rate Margin). The EuroDollar rate is subject to a minimum floor rate of 1.75% and the Base Rate is subject to a minimum floor of 2.75%.
Concurrently with the acquisition of the Company on May 28, 2010, Hillman Group issued $150,000 aggregate principal amount of its senior notes due June 1, 2018 (the 10.875% Senior Notes), which are guaranteed by Hillman Companies and its domestic subsidiaries other than the Hillman Group Capital Trust. Hillman Group pays interest on the 10.875% Senior Notes semi-annually on June 1 and December 1 of each year.
The proceeds received from the Senior Facilities and Senior Notes together with proceeds obtained from the sale of Successor equity securities were used to repay the senior term loans and unsecured subordinated notes and to purchase the equity securities of the Predecessor in connection with the Merger Transaction.
10. Common and Preferred Stock:
Common Stock
Prior to the Merger Transaction, Hillman Companies had three classes of Common Stock. Immediately prior to the consummation of the Merger Transaction, the Company had (i) 23,141 authorized shares of Class A Common Stock, 6,201 of which were issued and outstanding, (ii) 2,500 authorized shares of Class B Common Stock, 970.6 of which were issued and outstanding, and (iii) 30,109 authorized shares of Class C Common Stock, 2,787.1 of which issued and outstanding.
Each share of Class A Common Stock entitled its holder to one vote. Each holder of Class A Common Stock was entitled at any time to convert any or all of such shares into an equal number of shares of Class C Common Stock. Holders of Class B Common Stock had no voting rights. The Class B Common Stock was initially purchased by and issued to certain members of the Companys management and was subject to vesting over five years in connection with the acquisition of Hillman Companies by affiliates of CHS and OTPP in 2004. Each share of Class C Common Stock entitled its holder to one vote, provided that the aggregate voting power of Class C Common Stock (with respect to the election of directors) could not exceed 30%. Each holder of Class C Common Stock was entitled at any time to convert any or all of the shares into an equal number of shares of Class A Common Stock.
Under the terms of an executive services agreement entered into by certain members of the Companys management, such members of management had the right to put their shares of Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock back to Hillman Companies under certain circumstances.
Page 16
Table of Contents
THE HILLMAN COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
(dollars in thousands)
10. Common and Preferred Stock (continued):
Upon consummation of the Merger Transaction, each share of Class A Common Stock, Class B Common Stock and Class C Common Stock of Hillman Companies issued and outstanding immediately prior thereto (other than as set forth in the immediately preceding sentence), as well as each outstanding option to purchase any such shares of common stock, was converted into the right to receive, in cash, a portion of the merger consideration in the Merger Transaction. Certain such shares held by Company management were contributed by the holders thereof to Holdco in exchange for shares of Holdco.
After consummation of the Merger Transaction, Hillman Companies has one class of Common Stock. All outstanding shares of Hillman Companies common stock are owned by Holdco.
Preferred Stock:
Immediately prior to the Merger Transaction, Hillman Companies had 238,889 authorized shares of its Class A Preferred Stock, 82,104.8 of which were issued and outstanding and 13,450.7 of which were reserved for issuance upon the exercise of options to purchase shares of its Class A Preferred Stock. Holders of Hillman Companies Class A Preferred Stock were not entitled to any voting rights and were entitled to preferential dividends that accrued on a daily basis.
In addition, prior to the Merger Transaction, Hillman Investment Company, a subsidiary of Hillman Companies, had 166,667 authorized shares of its Class A Preferred Stock, 57,282.4 of which were issued and outstanding and 9,384.2 of which were reserved for issuance upon the exercise of options to purchase shares of its Class A Preferred Stock. Holders of Hillman Investment Companys Class A Preferred Stock were not entitled to any voting rights and were entitled to preferential dividends that accrued on a daily basis.
Upon consummation of the Merger Transaction, each share of Hillman Companies Class A Preferred Stock issued and outstanding immediately prior thereto, as well as each outstanding option to purchase any such shares of preferred stock, was converted into the right to receive an amount, in cash, equal to the liquidation value thereof plus all accrued and unpaid dividends on such shares as of the effective time of the Merger Transaction. In addition, at closing of the Merger Transaction, Hillman Investment Company redeemed each outstanding share of its Class A Preferred Stock at an amount equal to the liquidation value thereof plus all accrued and unpaid dividends on such shares as of the effective time of the Merger Transaction. Options to purchase shares of Hillman Investment Companys Class A Preferred Stock were cancelled in exchange for a similar cash payment.
After consummation of the Merger Transaction, neither Hillman Companies nor Hillman Investment Company has issued any shares of preferred stock or any options to purchase any such shares.
Page 17
Table of Contents
THE HILLMAN COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
(dollars in thousands)
11. Stock-Based Compensation:
On March 31, 2004, the Predecessor adopted its 2004 Stock Option Plan following Board of Director and shareholder approval. Grants under the 2004 Common Option Plan consisted of non-qualified stock options for the purchase of Class B Common Shares. In addition, immediately prior to the consummation of the Merger Transaction, there were outstanding options to purchase 9,274.08 shares of Hillman Companies Class A Preferred Stock and 6,470.36 shares of Hillman Investment Companys Class A Preferred Stock. In connection with the Merger Transaction, the 2004 Stock Option Plan was terminated, and all options outstanding thereunder were cancelled, and the options to purchase shares of Hillman Companies and Hillman Investment Companys Class A Preferred Stock were cancelled. See Note 10, Common and Preferred Stock, for more information.
Effective May 28, 2010, Holdco established the OHCP HM Acquisition Corp. 2010 Stock Option Plan (the Option Plan), pursuant to which Holdco may grant options for up to an aggregate of 34,293.469 shares of its common stock. The Option Plan is administered by a committee of the Holdco board of directors. Such committee determines the terms of each option grant under the Option Plan, except that the exercise price of any granted options may not be lower than the fair market value of one share of common stock of Holdco as of the date of grant. As of June 30, 2010, no options have been granted under the Option Plan.
12. Derivatives and Hedging:
The Company uses derivative financial instruments to manage its exposures to interest rate fluctuations on its floating rate senior debt. The Company measures those instruments at fair value and recognizes changes in the fair value of derivatives in earnings in the period of change, unless the derivative qualifies as an effective hedge that offsets certain exposures.
On August 29, 2008, the Company entered into an Interest Rate Swap Agreement (2008 Swap) with a three-year term for a notional amount of $50 million. The 2008 Swap fixed the interest rate at 3.41% plus applicable interest rate margin. The 2008 Swap was terminated on May 24, 2010.
The 2008 Swap was designated as a cash flow hedge, and prior to its termination on May 24, 2010, it was reported on the condensed consolidated balance sheet in other non-current liabilities with a related deferred charge recorded as a component of other comprehensive income in stockholders equity. For the period ended May 28, 2010, interest expense in the accompanying Predecessor condensed consolidated income statement includes a $1,579 charge incurred to terminate the 2008 Swap.
On June 24, 2010, the Company entered into an Interest Rate Swap Agreement (2010 Swap) with a two-year term for a notional amount of $115,000. The effective date of the 2010 Swap is May 31, 2011 and its termination date is May 31, 2013. The 2010 Swap fixes the interest rate at 2.47% plus the applicable interest rate margin.
The Company anticipates that the 2010 Swap will be designated as a cash flow hedge when it becomes effective at May 31, 2011. No deferred charges or gains related to the 2010 Swap were recorded as of June 30, 2010.
Page 18
Table of Contents
THE HILLMAN COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
(dollars in thousands)
13. Fair Value Measurements:
On January 1, 2008, the Company adopted the guidance that applies to all assets and liabilities that are being measured and reported on a fair value basis. The guidance defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The guidance also establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value and requires that assets and liabilities carried at fair value be classified and disclosed in one of the following three categories:
Level 1: Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2: Observable market-based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data.
Level 3: Unobservable inputs reflecting the reporting entitys own assumptions.
The accounting guidance establishes a hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of quoted market prices and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. An asset or liabilitys level is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
The following tables set forth the Companys financial assets and liabilities that were measured at fair value on a recurring basis during the periods ended June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, by level, within the fair value hierarchy:
As of June 30, 2010 | ||||||||||||||
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||||
Trading securities |
$ | 3,028 | $ | | $ | | $ | 3,028 | ||||||
Fixed rate debt |
| (150,000 | ) | | (150,000 | ) |
As of December 31, 2009 | ||||||||||||||
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||||
Trading securities |
$ | 3,043 | $ | | $ | | $ | 3,043 | ||||||
Interest rate swap |
| (1,894 | ) | | (1,894 | ) | ||||||||
Fixed rate debt |
| (49,820 | ) | | (49,820 | ) |
Trading securities are valued using quoted prices on an active exchange. Trading securities represent assets held in a Rabbi Trust to fund deferred compensation liabilities and are included as restricted investments on the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets.
For the five months ended May 28, 2010, the unrealized gains on these securities of $16 were recorded by the Predecessor as other income. For the one month ended June 30, 2010, the unrealized losses on these securities of $46 were recorded by the Successor as other expense. In each period, an offsetting entry, for the same amount, adjusting the deferred compensation liability and compensation expense within SG&A was also recorded.
For the six months ended June 30, 2009, the unrealized losses on these securities of $79 were recorded by the Predecessor as other expense. An offsetting entry, for the same amount, decreasing the deferred compensation liability and compensation expense within SG&A was also recorded.
Page 19
Table of Contents
THE HILLMAN COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
(dollars in thousands)
13. Fair Value Measurements (continued):
The Company utilizes interest rate swap contracts to manage its targeted mix of fixed and floating rate debt, and these swaps are valued using observable benchmark rates at commonly quoted intervals for the full term of the swaps. Prior to its termination on May 24, 2010, the 2008 Swap was included in other non-current liabilities on the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet. The 2010 Swap does not become effective until May 31, 2011 and its estimated fair value is zero at June 30, 2010.
Fixed rate debt is valued at its fair value which is approximately equal to its current outstanding principal amount and is included in long-term senior notes on the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets.
14. Non-Recurring Expenses:
In the quarter ended June 30, 2010, the Company incurred $21,714 of non-recurring, one-time charges related to the Merger Transaction. The Predecessor incurred $11,311 of the non-recurring expense total primarily for investment banking, legal and other advisory fees related to the sale of the Company. The remaining $10,403 of non-recurring expense was incurred by the Successor for legal, consulting, accounting and other advisory services incurred in connection with the acquisition of the Company.
15. Subsequent Events:
The Companys management has evaluated potential subsequent events for recording and disclosure in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010. There are no items requiring disclosure.
Page 20
Table of Contents
Item 2.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
All of the financial information presented in this Item 2 has been adjusted to reflect the restatement of the accompanying consolidated financial statements as of and for the three and six month fiscal periods ended June 30, 2009. Specifically, we have restated our condensed consolidated statement of income and condensed consolidated statement of cash flows for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009. The restatement is more fully described in Note 2 Restatement of Consolidated Financial Statements, which is included in the notes to condensed consolidated financial statements of this Form 10-Q.
The following discussion provides information which management believes is relevant to an assessment and understanding of the Company's operations and financial condition. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the condensed consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes.
Forward-Looking Statements
Certain disclosures related to acquisitions, refinancing, capital expenditures, resolution of pending litigation and realization of deferred tax assets contained in this quarterly report involve substantial risks and uncertainties and may constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as may, will, should, could, would, expect, plan, anticipate, believe, estimate, continue, project or the negative of such terms or other similar expressions.
These forward-looking statements are not historical facts, but rather are based on managements current expectations, assumptions and projections about future events. Although management believes that the expectations, assumptions and projections on which these forward-looking statements are based are reasonable, they nonetheless could prove to be inaccurate, and as a result, the forward-looking statements based on those expectations, assumptions and projections also could be inaccurate. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance. Instead, forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and assumptions that may cause the Companys strategy, planning, actual results, levels of activity, performance, or achievements to be materially different from any strategy, planning, future results, levels of activity, performance, or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Actual results could differ materially from those currently anticipated as a result of a number of factors, including the risks and uncertainties discussed under captions Risk Factors set forth in Item 1A of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, as amended by Amendment No.1 to the Companys annual report filed on Form 10-K/A. Given these uncertainties, current or prospective investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements.
All forward-looking statements attributable to the Company or persons acting on its behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements included in this report and the risk factors referenced above; they should not be regarded as a representation by the Company or any other individual. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the forward-looking events discussed in this report might not occur or be materially different from those discussed.
General
The Hillman Companies, Inc. (Hillman or the Company) is one of the largest providers of hardware-related products and related merchandising services to retail markets in North America through its wholly-owned subsidiary, The Hillman Group, Inc.
Page 21
Table of Contents
(Hillman Group). A subsidiary of Hillman Group operates in (1) Canada under the name The Hillman Group Canada, Ltd., (2) Mexico under the name SunSource Integrated Services de Mexico SA de CV, and (3) primarily in Florida under the name All Points Industries, Inc. Hillman Group sells its product lines and provides its services to hardware stores, home centers, mass merchants, pet supply stores, and other retail outlets principally in the United States, Canada, Mexico, Latin America and the Caribbean. Product lines include thousands of small parts such as fasteners and related hardware items; threaded rod and metal shapes; keys, key duplication systems and accessories; and identification items, such as, tags and letters, numbers, and signs (LNS). Services offered include design and installation of merchandising systems and maintenance of appropriate in-store inventory levels.
Merger Transaction
On May 28, 2010, Hillman was acquired by affiliates of Oak Hill Capital Partners (OHCP) and certain members of Hillmans management and Board of Directors. Pursuant to the terms and conditions of an Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of April 21, 2010, the Company was merged with an affiliate of OHCP with the Company surviving the merger (the Merger Transaction). As a result of the Merger Transaction, Hillman is a wholly-owned subsidiary of OCHP HM Acquisition Corp. (Holdco). The total consideration paid in the Merger Transaction was $831.1 million including repayment of outstanding debt and including the value of the Companys outstanding junior subordinated debentures ($105.4 million liquidation value at time of the merger). The merger consideration is subject to certain post-closing working capital and other adjustments.
Prior to the Merger Transaction, affiliates of Code Hennessy & Simmons LLC (CHS) owned 49.3% of the Companys outstanding common stock and 54.6% of the Companys voting common stock, Ontario Teachers Pension Plan (OTPP) owned 28.0% of the Companys outstanding common stock and 31.0% of the Companys voting common stock and HarbourVest Partners VI owned 8.7% of the Companys outstanding common stock and 9.7% of the Companys voting common stock. Certain current and former members of management owned 13.7% of the Companys outstanding common stock and 4.4% of the Companys voting common stock.
The Companys condensed consolidated balance sheet as of May 28, 2010 and its related statements of operations, cash flows and changes in stockholders equity for the periods presented prior to May 28, 2010 are referenced herein as the predecessor financial statements (the Predecessor or Predecessor Financial Statements). The Companys condensed consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2010 and its related statements of operations, cash flows and changes in stockholders equity for the periods presented subsequent to the Merger Transaction are referenced herein as the successor financial statements (the Successor or Successor Financial Statements). The Predecessor Financial Statements do not reflect certain transaction amounts that were incurred at the close of the Merger Transaction. Such transaction amounts include the write-off of $5.0 million in deferred financing fees associated with the Predecessor debt obligations.
Financing Arrangements
On May 28, 2010, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries closed on a $320.0 million senior secured first lien credit facility (the Senior Facilities), consisting of a $290.0 million term loan and a $30.0 million revolving credit facility (Revolver). The term loan portion of the Senior Facilities has a six year term and the Revolver has a five year term. The Senior Facilities provide borrowings at interest rates based on a EuroDollar rate plus a margin of 3.75% (the EuroDollar Margin), or a base rate (the Base Rate) plus a margin of 2.75% (the Base Rate Margin). The EuroDollar rate is subject to a minimum floor of 1.75% and the Base Rate is subject to a minimum floor of 2.75%.
Concurrently with the consummation of the Merger Transaction, Hillman Group issued $150.0 million aggregate principal amount of its senior notes due June 1, 2018 (the 10.875% Senior Notes), which are guaranteed by Hillman and its domestic subsidiaries other than the Hillman Group Capital Trust (the Trust). Hillman Group pays interest on the 10.875% Senior Notes semi-annually on June 1 and December 1 of each year.
Page 22
Table of Contents
Prior to the consummation of the Merger Transaction, the Company, through Hillman Group, was party to a Senior Credit Agreement (the Old Credit Agreement), consisting of a $20.0 million revolving credit line and a $235.0 million term loan. The facilities under the Old Credit Agreement had a maturity date of March 31, 2012. In addition, the Company, through Hillman Group, had issued $49.8 million in aggregate principal amount of unsecured subordinated notes to a group of investors, including affiliates of AEA Investors LP, CIG & Co. and several private investors that were scheduled to mature on September 30, 2012. In connection with the Merger Transaction, both the Old Credit Agreement and the subordinated note issuance were repaid and terminated.
The Senior Facilities contain financial and operating covenants. These covenants require the Company to maintain certain financial ratios, including an interest coverage ratio and leverage ratios. These debt agreements provide for customary events of default, including, but not limited to, payment defaults, breach of representations or covenants, cross-defaults, bankruptcy events, failure to pay judgments, attachment of its assets, change of control and the issuance of an order of dissolution. Certain of these events of default are subject to notice and cure periods or materiality thresholds. The occurrence of an event of default permits the lenders under the Senior Facilities to accelerate repayment of all amounts due.
The Company pays interest to the Trust on the Junior Subordinated Debentures underlying the Trust Preferred Securities at the rate of 11.6% per annum on their face amount of $105.4 million, or $12.2 million per annum in the aggregate. The Trust distributes an equivalent amount to the holders of the Trust Preferred Securities. In order to retain capital, the Companys Board of Directors determined to temporarily defer interest payments on the Junior Subordinated Debentures and the Trust determined to defer the payment of cash distributions to holders of Trust Preferred Securities beginning with the January 2009 distribution. The Companys decision to defer the payment of interest on the Junior Subordinated Debentures was designed to ensure that the Company preserve cash and maintain its compliance with the financial covenants contained in its Senior Credit and Subordinated Debt Agreements. Pursuant to the Indenture that governs the Trust Preferred Securities, the Trust is able to defer distribution payments to holders of the Trust Preferred Securities for a period that cannot exceed 60 months (the Deferral Period). During the Deferral Period, the Company was required to accrue the full amount of all interest payable, and such deferred interest payable was immediately payable by the Company at the end of the Deferral Period. On July 31, 2009, the Company ended the Deferral Period and the Trust resumed monthly distributions and paid all deferred distributions to holders of the Trust Preferred Securities.
On August 29, 2008, the Company entered into an Interest Rate Swap Agreement (the 2008 Swap) with a three-year term for a notional amount of $50 million. The 2008 Swap fixed the interest rate at 3.41% plus applicable interest rate margin. The 2008 Swap was terminated on May 24, 2010.
On June 24, 2010, the Company entered into an Interest Rate Swap Agreement (the 2010 Swap) with a two-year term for a notional amount of $115 million. The effective date of the 2010 Swap is May 31, 2011 and its termination date is May 31, 2013. The 2010 Swap fixes the interest rate at 2.47% plus applicable interest rate margin.
Page 23
Table of Contents
Results of Operations
The Companys accompanying interim condensed consolidated financial statements are presented for two periods, Predecessor and Successor, which relate to the accounting periods preceding and succeeding the completion of the Merger Transaction. The Predecessor and Successor periods have been separated by a vertical line on the face of the condensed consolidated financial statements to highlight the fact that the financial information for such periods has been prepared under two different historical cost bases of accounting. The following analysis of results of operations includes a brief discussion of the factors that affected the Companys operating results in the Predecessor period of April 1 May 28, 2010, and a comparative analysis of the Successor period of May 29 June 30, 2010 and the Predecessor period of the three months ended June 30, 2009.
Successor | Predecessor | Predecessor | |||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | One Month Ended June 30, 2010 Amount |
% of Total |
Two Months Ended May 28, 2010 Amount |
% of Total |
Three Months Ended June 30, 2009 Amount |
% of Total |
|||||||||||||||||
(As restated) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 47,700 | 100.0 | % | $ | 77,256 | 100.0 | % | $ | 123,813 | 100.0 | % | |||||||||||
Cost of sales (exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown separately below) |
23,022 | 48.3 | % | 37,835 | 49.0 | % | 61,109 | 49.4 | % | ||||||||||||||
Gross profit |
24,678 | 51.7 | % | 39,421 | 51.0 | % | 62,704 | 50.6 | % | ||||||||||||||
Operating expenses: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Selling |
7,193 | 15.1 | % | 12,722 | 16.5 | % | 19,174 | 15.5 | % | ||||||||||||||
Warehouse & delivery |
5,046 | 10.6 | % | 8,121 | 10.5 | % | 12,478 | 10.1 | % | ||||||||||||||
General & administrative |
2,060 | 4.3 | % | 4,093 | 5.3 | % | 6,120 | 4.9 | % | ||||||||||||||
Stock compensation expense |
| 0.0 | % | 17,626 | 22.8 | % | 2,504 | 2.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
Total SG&A |
14,299 | 30.0 | % | 42,562 | 55.1 | % | 40,276 | 32.5 | % | ||||||||||||||
Non-recurring expense (a) |
10,403 | 21.8 | % | 11,311 | 14.6 | % | | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
Depreciation |
1,522 | 3.2 | % | 2,993 | 3.9 | % | 4,214 | 3.4 | % | ||||||||||||||
Amortization |
1,009 | 2.1 | % | 1,071 | 1.4 | % | 1,809 | 1.5 | % | ||||||||||||||
Management and transaction fees to related party |
| 0.0 | % | 187 | 0.2 | % | 256 | 0.2 | % | ||||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
27,233 | 57.1 | % | 58,124 | 75.2 | % | 46,555 | 37.6 | % | ||||||||||||||
Other (expense) income, net |
(136 | ) | -0.3 | % | (227 | ) | -0.3 | % | 166 | 0.1 | % | ||||||||||||
(Loss) income from operations |
(2,691 | ) | -5.6 | % | (18,930 | ) | -24.5 | % | 16,315 | 13.2 | % | ||||||||||||
Interest expense, net |
3,619 | 7.6 | % | 4,147 | 5.4 | % | 3,300 | 2.7 | % | ||||||||||||||
Interest expense on mandatorily redeemable preferred stock & management purchased options |
| 0.0 | % | 2,242 | 2.9 | % | 3,031 | 2.4 | % | ||||||||||||||
Interest expense on junior subordinated notes |
1,051 | 2.2 | % | 2,102 | 2.7 | % | 3,272 | 2.6 | % | ||||||||||||||
Investment income on trust common securities |
(31 | ) | -0.1 | % | (63 | ) | -0.1 | % | (94 | ) | -0.1 | % | |||||||||||
(Loss) income before income taxes |
(7,330 | ) | -15.4 | % | (27,358 | ) | -35.4 | % | 6,806 | 5.5 | % | ||||||||||||
Income tax (benefit) provision |
(1,860 | ) | -3.9 | % | (3,719 | ) | -4.8 | % | 4,453 | 3.6 | % | ||||||||||||
Net (loss) income |
$ | (5,470 | ) | -11.5 | % | $ | (23,639 | ) | -30.6 | % | $ | 2,353 | 1.9 | % | |||||||||
(a) | Represents one-time charges for investment banking, legal and other professional fees incurred in connection with the Merger Transaction. |
Page 24
Table of Contents
Current Economic Conditions
The U.S. economy has undergone a period of recession and the future economic environment may continue to be less favorable than that of recent years. This slowdown has, and could further lead to, reduced consumer and business spending in the foreseeable future, including by our customers. In addition, economic conditions, including decreased access to credit, may result in financial difficulties leading to restructurings, bankruptcies, liquidations and other unfavorable events for our customers, suppliers and other service providers. If such conditions continue or further deteriorate in the remainder of 2010 or through fiscal 2011, our industry, business and results of operations may be impacted.
The Companys business is impacted by general economic conditions in the U.S. and international markets, particularly the U.S. retail markets including hardware stores, home centers, mass merchants, and other retailers. In recent quarters, operations have been negatively impacted by the general downturn in the U.S. economy, including higher unemployment figures, and the contraction of the retail market. Although there have been certain signs of improvement in the economy, generally such conditions are not expected to improve significantly in the near term and may have the effect of reducing consumer spending which could adversely affect our results of operations during the remainder of this year or beyond.
The Company is sensitive to inflation or deflation present in the economies of the United States and foreign suppliers located primarily in Taiwan and China. For the last several years leading up to 2009, the rapid growth in Chinas economic activity produced significantly rising costs of certain imported fastener products. In addition, the cost of commodities such as copper, zinc, aluminum, nickel, and plastics used in the manufacture of other Company products increased sharply. Further, increases in the cost of diesel fuel contributed to transportation rate increases. In the second half of 2008 and during the first half of 2009, national and international economic difficulties started a reversal of the trend of rising costs for our products and commodities used in the manufacture of our products, including a decrease in the cost of oil and diesel fuel. During the second half of 2009 and the first half of 2010,the Company has seen an end to decreasing costs and, in certain instances, moderate increases in the costs for our products and commodities used in the manufacture of our products. While inflation and resulting cost increases over a period of years would result in significant increases in inventory costs and operating expenses, the opposite is true when exposed to a prolonged period of cost decreases. The ability of the Company's operating divisions to institute price increases and seek price concessions, as appropriate, is dependent on competitive market conditions.
Predecessor Period of April 1 - May 28, 2010 vs Predecessor Period of the Three Months Ended June 30, 2009
Revenues
Net sales for the period of April 1 May 28, 2010 (the 2010 two month period) were $77.3 million, or $1.93 million per ship day, compared to net sales for the second quarter of 2009 of $123.8 million, or $1.97 million per ship day. The decrease in revenue of $46.5 million was directly attributable to comparing operating results of 40 ship days in the 2010 two month period to the results from 63 ship days in 2009. The sales per ship day of $1.93 million in the 2010 two month period was approximately 2.0% less than the sales per ship day of $1.97 million in the second quarter of 2009.
Expenses
Operating expenses for the period of April 1 May 28, 2010 were $58.1 million compared to $46.6 million for the second quarter of 2009. The increase in operating expenses is primarily due to the higher amount of stock compensation and non-recurring expense recorded in connection with the Merger Transaction in the 2010 two month period. The shorter 40 day ship period in the 2010 two month period provided certain favorable operating expense variances as compared to the 63 day ship period in the second quarter of 2009. The following changes in underlying trends also impacted the change in operating expenses:
| The Companys gross profit percentage was 51.0% in the 2010 two month period compared to 50.6% in the second quarter of 2009. The Company experienced a significant increase in the unit cost of inventory during most of 2008 as a result of increases in related commodities used in our products such as steel, zinc, nickel, aluminum, copper and plastics. The higher unit cost negatively impacted gross profit in the second half of 2008 and first half of 2009 as the higher unit cost product sold through inventory. In 2009, commodity prices moderated and in particular the cost of steel based fasteners sourced primarily from Taiwan and China returned to the levels prior to the significant price increases seen in 2008. The Company anticipates that the average inventory unit costs will remain stable for the remainder of this year. |
| Warehouse and delivery expense was $8.1 million, or 10.5% of net sales, in the 2010 two month period compared to $12.5 million, 10.1% of net sales in the second quarter of 2009. Freight expense, the largest component of warehouse and delivery expense, increased from 3.9% of net sales in 2009 to 4.4% of net sales in the 2010 period. The 2010 freight costs included the negative impact of higher fuel surcharges and lower average customer order sizes. |
| Stock compensation expenses from stock options primarily related to the 2004 Merger Transaction resulted in a charge of $17.6 million in the 2010 two month period. The change in the fair value of the Class B Common Stock is included in stock compensation expense and this resulted in an additional charge of $13.4 million. The significant increase in the fair value of the Class B Common Stock in this predecessor period resulted from the acquisition price paid by OHCP for the Company. In addition, a stock compensation charge of $3.7 million was recorded for the increase in the fair value of the common stock options. The stock compensation expense was $2.5 million in the second quarter of 2009. |
| Non-recurring expense of $11.3 million in the 2010 two month period represents one-time charges for investment banking, legal and other expenses incurred by the Predecessor in connection with the Merger Transaction. There were no non-recurring expenses in the second quarter of 2009. |
| Interest expense, net, was $4.1 million in the 2010 two month period compared to $3.3 million for the second quarter of 2009. The increase in interest expense for the 2010 two month period was primarily the result of a $1.6 million interest charge incurred for the termination of the 2008 Swap. |
Page 25
Table of Contents
Successor Period of May 28 June 30, 2010 vs Predecessor Period of the Three Months Ended June 30, 2009
Revenues
Net sales for the period of May 28 June 30, 2010 (the 2010 period) were $47.7 million, or $1.99 million per ship day, compared to net sales for the second quarter of 2009 of $123.8 million, or $1.97 million per ship day. The decrease in revenues of $76.1 million are directly attributable to comparing operating results of 24 ship days in the 2010 period to the results from 63 ship days in 2009. However, the sales per ship day of $1.99 million in the 2010 period were approximately 1.0% more than the sales per ship day of $1.97 million in the second quarter of 2009.
Expenses
Operating expenses for the 2010 period ended June 30, 2010 were $27.2 million compared to $46.6 million for the second quarter of 2009. The decrease in operating expenses is primarily due to the 24 day ship period in the 2010 period as compared to the 63 day ship period in the second quarter of 2009. The following changes in underlying trends also impacted the change in operating expenses:
| The Companys gross profit percentage was 51.7% in the 2010 period compared to 50.6% in the second quarter of 2009. The Company experienced a significant increase in the unit cost of inventory during most of 2008 as a result of increases in related commodities used in our products such as steel, zinc, nickel, aluminum, copper and plastics. The higher unit cost negatively impacted gross profit in the second half of 2008 and first half of 2009 as the higher unit cost product sold through inventory. In 2009, commodity prices moderated and in particular the cost of steel based fasteners sourced primarily from Taiwan and China returned to the levels prior to the significant price increases seen in 2008. The Company anticipates that the average inventory unit costs will remain stable for the remainder of this year. |
| Warehouse and delivery expense was $5.0 million, or 10.6% of net sales, in the 2010 period compared to $12.5 million, or 10.1% of net sales in the second quarter of 2009. Freight expense, the largest component of warehouse and delivery expense, increased from 3.9% of net sales in 2009 to 4.6% of net sales in the 2010 period. The 2010 freight costs included the negative impact of higher fuel surcharges and lower average customer order sizes. |
| No stock options or incentive awards have been granted by the Successor, and accordingly, there was no stock compensation expense recorded in the 2010 period. The stock compensation expense was $2.5 million in the second quarter of 2009. |
| Non-recurring expense of $10.4 million in the 2010 period represents one-time charges for legal, professional, diligence and other expenses incurred by the Successor in connection with the Merger Transaction. There were no non-recurring expenses in the second quarter of 2009. |
| Amortization expense was $1.0 million in the 2010 period, or an estimated annual rate of $12.0 million. The amortization expense of $1.8 million in the second quarter of 2009 amounted to an estimated annual rate of approximately $7.1 million. The higher annual rate of amortization expense for the 2010 period was due to the increase in intangible assets subject to amortization acquired as a result of the Merger Transaction. |
| Interest expense, net, was $3.6 million in the 2010 period, or an estimated annual rate of approximately $43.2 million. The interest expense was $3.3 million for the second quarter of 2009, or an estimated annual rate of approximately $13.2 million. The increase in estimated annual rate of interest expense was primarily the result of the higher level of debt outstanding following the Merger Transaction. |
| The Successor incurred no interest expense on mandatorily redeemable preferred stock and management purchased options as a result of their redemption in connection with the Merger Transaction. The interest expense on these securities was $3.0 million for the second quarter of 2009. |
Page 26
Table of Contents
The Companys accompanying interim condensed consolidated financial statements are presented for two periods, Predecessor and Successor, which relate to the accounting periods preceding and succeeding the completion of the Merger Transaction. The Predecessor and Successor periods have been separated by a vertical line on the face of the condensed consolidated financial statements to highlight the fact that the financial information for such periods has been prepared under two different historical cost bases of accounting. The following analysis of results of operations includes a brief discussion of the factors that affected the Companys operating results in the Predecessor period of January 1 May 28, 2010, and a comparative analysis of the Successor period of May 29 June 30, 2010 and the Predecessor period of the six months ended June 30, 2009.
Successor | Predecessor | Predecessor | |||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) |
One Month Ended June 30, 2010 Amount |
% of Total |
Five Months Ended May 28, 2010 Amount |
% of Total |
Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 Amount |
% of Total |
|||||||||||||||
(As restated) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 47,700 | 100.0 | % | $ | 185,716 | 100.0 | % | $ | 236,026 | 100.0 | % | |||||||||
Cost of sales (exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown separately below) |
23,022 | 48.3 | % | 89,773 | 48.3 | % | 119,385 | 50.6 | % | ||||||||||||
Gross profit |
24,678 | 51.7 | % | 95,943 | 51.7 | % | 116,641 | 49.4 | % | ||||||||||||
Operating expenses: |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Selling |
7,193 | 15.1 | % | 33,568 | 18.1 | % | 39,716 | 16.8 | % | ||||||||||||
Warehouse & delivery |
5,046 | 10.6 | % | 19,945 | 10.7 | % | 24,220 | 10.3 | % | ||||||||||||
General & administrative |
2,060 | 4.3 | % | 10,284 | 5.5 | % | 12,480 | 5.3 | % | ||||||||||||
Stock compensation expense |
| 0.0 | % | 19,053 | 10.3 | % | 3,800 | 1.6 | % | ||||||||||||
Total SG&A |
14,299 | 30.0 | % | 82,850 | 44.6 | % | 80,216 | 34.0 | % | ||||||||||||
Non-recurring expense (a) |
10,403 | 21.8 | % | 11,342 | 6.1 | % | | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||
Depreciation |
1,522 | 3.2 | % | 7,283 | 3.9 | % | 8,892 | 3.8 | % | ||||||||||||
Amortization |
1,009 | 2.1 | % | 2,678 | 1.4 | % | 3,537 | 1.5 | % | ||||||||||||
Management and transaction fees to related party |
| 0.0 | % | 438 | 0.2 | % | 509 | 0.2 | % | ||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
27,233 | 57.1 | % | 104,591 | 56.3 | % | 93,154 | 39.5 | % | ||||||||||||
Other expense, net |
(136 | ) | -0.3 | % | (114 | ) | -0.1 | % | (467 | ) | -0.2 | % | |||||||||
(Loss) income from operations |
(2,691 | ) | -5.6 | % | (8,762 | ) | -4.7 | % | 23,020 | 9.8 | % | ||||||||||
Interest expense, net |
3,619 | 7.6 | % | 8,327 | 4.5 | % | 7,128 | 3.0 | % | ||||||||||||
Interest expense on mandatorily redeemable preferred stock & management purchased options |
| 0.0 | % | 5,488 | 3.0 | % | 5,949 | 2.5 | % | ||||||||||||
Interest expense on junior subordinated notes |
1,051 | 2.2 | % | 5,254 | 2.8 | % | 6,454 | 2.7 | % | ||||||||||||
Investment income on trust common securities |
(31 | ) | -0.1 | % | (158 | ) | -0.1 | % | (189 | ) | -0.1 | % | |||||||||
(Loss) income before income taxes |
(7,330 | ) | -15.4 | % | (27,673 | ) | -14.9 | % | 3,678 | 1.6 | % | ||||||||||
Income tax (benefit) provision |
(1,860 | ) | -3.9 | % | (2,465 | ) | -1.3 | % | 5,162 | 2.2 | % | ||||||||||
Net loss |
$ | (5,470 | ) | -11.5 | % | $ | (25,208 | ) | -13.6 | % | $ | (1,484 | ) | -0.6 | % | ||||||
(a) | Represents one-time charges for investment banking, legal and other professional fees incurred in connection with the Merger Transaction. |
Page 27
Table of Contents
Predecessor Period of January 1 May 28, 2010 vs Predecessor Period of the Six Months Ended June 30, 2009
Revenues
Net sales for the period of January 1 May 28, 2010 (the 2010 five month period) were $185.7 million, or $1.77 million per shipping day, compared to net sales for the first half of 2009 of $236.0 million, or $1.83 million per shipping day. The decrease in revenues of $50.3 million was directly attributable to comparing operating results of 105 shipping days in the 2010 five month period to the results from 129 shipping days in 2009. The sales per shipping day of $1.77 million in the 2010 five month period was approximately 3.3% lower than the sales per shipping day of $1.83 million in the first half of 2009. The decrease in sales per day for the 2010 five month period was the result of higher seasonal sales per day during the June period included in the first half of 2009 as compared to the average sales per day for the January to May period.
Expenses
Operating expenses for the period of January 1 May 28, 2010 were $104.6 million compared to $93.2 million for the first half of 2009. The increase in operating expenses is primarily due to the higher amount of stock compensation and non-recurring expense recorded in connection with the Merger Transaction in the 2010 five month period. The shorter 105 day ship period in the 2010 five month period provided certain favorable operating expense variances as compared to the 129 day ship period in the first half of 2009. The following changes in underlying trends also impacted the change in operating expenses:
| The Companys gross profit percentage was 51.7% in the 2010 five month period compared to 49.4% in the first half of 2009. The Company experienced a significant increase in the unit cost of inventory during most of 2008 as a result of increases in related commodities used in our products such as steel, zinc, nickel, aluminum, copper and plastics. The higher unit cost negatively impacted gross profit in the second half of 2008 and first half of 2009 as the higher unit cost product sold through inventory. In 2009, commodity prices moderated and in particular the cost of steel based fasteners sourced primarily from Taiwan and China returned to the levels prior to the significant price increases seen in 2008. The Company anticipates that the average inventory unit costs will remain stable for the remainder of this year. |
| Warehouse and delivery expense was $19.9 million, or 10.7% of net sales, in the 2010 five month period compared to $24.2 million, 10.3% of net sales in the first half of 2009. Freight expense, the largest component of warehouse and delivery expense, increased from 3.8% of net sales in 2009 to 4.1% of net sales in the 2010 five month period. The 2010 freight costs included the negative impact of higher fuel surcharges and lower average customer order sizes. |
| Stock compensation expenses from stock options primarily related to the 2004 Merger Transaction resulted in a charge of $19.1 million in the 2010 five month period. The change in the fair value of the Class B Common Stock is included in stock compensation expense and this resulted in an additional charge of $13.9 million. The significant increase in the fair value of the Class B Common Stock in this predecessor period resulted from the acquisition price paid by OHCP for the Company. In addition, a stock compensation charge of $3.7 million was recorded for the increase in the fair value of the common stock options. The stock compensation expense was $3.8 million in the first half of 2009. |
| Non-recurring expense of $11.3 million in the 2010 five month period represents one-time charges for investment banking, legal and other expenses incurred in connection with the Merger Transaction. There were no non-recurring expenses in the first half of 2009. |
| Interest expense, net, was $8.3 million in the 2010 five month period compared to $7.1 million for the first half of 2009. The increase in interest expense for the 2010 five month period was primarily the result of a $1.6 million interest charge incurred for the termination of the 2008 Swap. |
Successor Period of May 28 June 30, 2010 vs Predecessor Period of the Six Months Ended June 30, 2009
Revenues
Net sales for the period of May 28 June 30, 2010 were $47.7 million, or $1.99 million per shipping day, compared to net sales for the first half of 2009 of $236.0 million, or $1.83 million per shipping day. The decrease in revenues of $188.3 million was directly attributable to comparing operating results of 24 shipping days in the 2010 period to the results from 129 shipping days in 2009. However, the sales per shipping day of $1.99 million in the 2010 period was approximately 8.7% higher than the sales per shipping day of $1.83 million in the first half of 2009. The increase in sales per day for the 2010 period was the result of higher seasonal sales per day during the June period as compared to the average sales per day for the January to June period of 2009.
Expenses
Operating expenses for the 2010 period ended June 30, 2010 were $27.2 million compared to $93.2 million for the first half of 2009. The decrease in operating expenses is primarily due to the 24 day shipping period in the 2010 period as compared to the 129 day shipping period in the first half of 2009. The following changes in underlying trends also impacted the change in operating expenses:
| The Companys gross profit percentage was 51.7% in the 2010 period compared to 49.4% in the first half of 2009. The Company experienced a significant increase in the unit cost of inventory during most of 2008 as a result of increases in related commodities used in our products such as steel, zinc, nickel, aluminum, copper and plastics. The higher unit cost negatively impacted gross profit in the second half of 2008 and first half of 2009 as the higher unit cost product sold through inventory. In 2009, commodity prices moderated and in particular the cost of steel based fasteners sourced primarily from Taiwan and China returned to the levels prior to the significant price increases seen in 2008. The Company anticipates that the average inventory unit costs will remain stable for the remainder of this year. |
| Warehouse and delivery expense was $5.0 million, or 10.6% of net sales, in the 2010 period compared to $24.2 million, or 10.3% of net sales in the first half of 2009. Freight expense, the largest component of warehouse and delivery expense, increased from 3.8% of net sales in 2009 to 4.6% of net sales in the 2010 period. The 2010 freight costs included the negative impact of higher fuel surcharges and lower average customer order sizes. |
Page 28
Table of Contents
| No stock options or incentive awards have been granted by the Successor, and accordingly, there was no stock compensation expense recorded in the 2010 period. The stock compensation expense was $3.8 million in the first half of 2009. |
| Non-recurring expense of $10.4 million in the 2010 period represents one-time charges for legal, professional, diligence and other expenses incurred by the Successor in connection with the Merger Transaction. There were no non-recurring expenses in the first half of 2009. |
| Amortization expense was $1.0 million in the 2010 period, or an estimated annual rate of $12.0 million. The amortization expense of $3.5 million in the first half of 2009 amounted to an estimated annual rate of approximately $7.1 million. The higher annual rate of amortization expense for the 2010 period was due to the increase in intangible assets subject to amortization acquired as a result of the Merger Transaction. |
| Interest expense, net, was $3.6 million in the 2010 period, or an estimated annual rate of approximately $43.2 million. The interest expense was $7.1 million for the first half of 2009, or an estimated annual rate of approximately $14.2 million. The increase in estimated annual rate of interest expense was primarily the result of the higher level of debt outstanding following the Merger Transaction. |
| The Successor incurred no interest expense on mandatorily redeemable preferred stock and management purchased options as a result of their redemption in connection with the Merger Transaction. The interest expense on these securities was $6.0 million for the first half of 2009. |
Income Taxes
In the second quarter of 2010, the Company recognized a $0.3 million increase in valuation reserves recorded against certain deferred tax assets. This impacted the effective income tax rate from the federal statutory rate by -0.9% in the six month period ended June 30, 2010. Also in the second quarter of 2010, the Company recognized a $1.6 million increase in its reserves for uncertainty in accounting for income taxes. This adjustment decreased the deferred tax asset related to the future tax benefit of the Companys net operating loss carryforward. This impacted the effective income tax rate from the federal statutory rate by -4.4% in the six month period ended June 30, 2010.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash Flows
The statements of cash flows reflect the changes in cash and cash equivalents for the one month ended June 30, 2010 (Successor), the five months ended May 28, 2010 (Predecessor) and the six months ended June 30, 2009 (Predecessor) by classifying transactions into three major categories: operating, investing and financing activities. The cash flows from the Merger Transaction are separately discussed below.
Merger Transaction
In connection with the Merger Transaction, the Company issued common stock for $308.6 million in cash. Proceeds from borrowings under the Senior Facilities provided an additional $290.6 million and proceeds from the 10.875% Senior Notes provided $150.0 million, less aggregate financing fees of $15.7 million. The debt and equity proceeds were used to repay the existing senior and subordinated debt and accrued interest thereon of $199.1 million, to repurchase the existing shareholders common equity, preferred equity and stock options of $506.4 million, and to purchase the Quick Tag license for $11.5 million. The remaining proceeds were used to pay transaction expenses of $16.4 million and prepaid expenses of $0.1 million.
Operating Activities
Excluding $17.5 million in cash used for the Merger Transaction, net cash provided by operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2010 of $9.8 million was the result of the net loss adjusted for non-cash charges of $11.0 million for depreciation, amortization, deferred taxes, deferred financing, stock-based compensation and interest on mandatorily redeemable preferred stock and management purchased options which was offset by cash related adjustments of $1.2 million for routine operating activities represented by changes in inventories, accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued liabilities and other assets. In the first six months of 2010, routine operating activities used cash through an increase in accounts receivable of $16.5 million and other of $1.3 million. This was partially offset by an increase in accounts payable of $8.8 million, an increase in accrued liabilities of $7.4 million, a decrease in inventories of $0.4 million. The increase in accounts receivable was the result of the seasonal increase in sales for the latter part of the second quarter.
Page 29
Table of Contents
Operating activities in the first six months of 2009 provided cash of $34.7 million, or an increase of $35.2 million, compared to the cash used of $0.5 million for the same period of 2008. The Companys operating cash outflows have historically been higher in the first two fiscal quarters when selling volume, accounts receivable and inventory levels increase as the Company moves into the stronger spring and summer selling seasons. However, in the first six months of 2009, $13.4 million in cash was provided from the reduction of inventory levels compared to cash used of $4.8 in the prior year period. The 2009 inventory level has decreased from the prior year end in terms of both units and unit costs primarily as a result of the implementation of lean purchasing initiatives and lower purchase prices. The seasonal increase of accounts receivable was only $15.1 million in the first six months of 2009 compared to $26.0 million in the prior year period. In addition, the deferral of distributions on the Trust Preferred Securities provided cash of $6.3 million in the first six months of 2009 compared to cash provided of $1.0 in the same period of 2008.
Investing Activities
The Company used cash of $11.5 million from the Merger Transaction to purchase the licensing rights and related patents for the Quick Tag business. Excluding the $11.5 million used for the Quick Tag acquisition, net cash used for investing activities was $6.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010. Capital expenditures for the six months totaled $6.8 million, consisting of $4.6 million for key duplicating machines, $0.6 million for engraving machines, and $1.6 million for computer software and equipment.
Net cash used for investing activities was $5.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009. Capital expenditures for the first six months of 2009 were $5.3 million, a decrease of $2.4 million from the comparable period of 2008. The net property additions for the first six months of 2009 consisted of $3.1 million for key duplicating machines, $0.4 million for engraving machines and $1.8 million for computer software and equipment.
Financing Activities
Excluding $29.0 million in cash provided by borrowings related to the Merger Transaction, net cash used for financing activities was $10.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010. The net cash used was primarily related to the principal payments on the senior term loans of $9.5 million and further payments of $0.6 million on the revolving credit facility and $0.5 million on capitalized lease obligations.
Net cash used for financing activities in the six months ended June 30, 2009 was $13.8 million. The net cash generated from Operating Activities in 2009 together with cash on hand at the beginning of the year was used to fund the senior term loan repayments of $14.0 million.
Page 30
Table of Contents
Liquidity
The Company's working capital position (defined as current assets less current liabilities) of $120.6 million at June 30, 2010 represents an increase of $10.0 million from the December 31, 2009 level of $110.6 million. The primary reasons for the increase in working capital were an increase in accounts receivable of $16.5 million, a decrease of $6.6 million in the current portion of senior term loans, a decrease in other accrued expenses of $2.7 million, an increase in other current assets of $0.7 million and a decrease in the current portion of capitalized lease obligations of $0.3 million which were partially offset by an increase in accounts payable of $8.8 million, a decrease in cash of $7.5 million and a decrease in inventories and deferred taxes of $0.5 million. The Companys current ratio (defined as current assets divided by current liabilities) increased to 3.33x at June 30, 2010 from 3.10x at December 31, 2009.
Contractual Obligations
The Companys contractual obligations in thousands of dollars as of June 30, 2010:
Payments Due | |||||||||||||||
Contractual Obligations |
Total | Less Than 1 Year |
1 to 3 Years |
3 to 5 Years |
More Than 5 Years |
||||||||||
Junior Subordinated Debentures (1) |
$ | 116,050 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 116,050 | |||||
Senior Term Loans |
290,000 | 2,900 | 5,800 | 5,800 | 275,500 | ||||||||||
Bank Revolving Credit Facility |
| | | | | ||||||||||
10.875% Senior Notes |
150,000 | | | | 150,000 | ||||||||||
Interest Payments (2) |
220,837 | 32,203 | 63,927 | 63,289 | 61,418 | ||||||||||
Operating Leases |
32,641 | 7,516 | 10,440 | 4,954 | 9,731 | ||||||||||
Deferred Compensation Obligations |
3,028 | 334 | 668 | 668 | 1,358 | ||||||||||
Capital Lease Obligations |
56 | 39 | 16 | 1 | | ||||||||||
Purchase Obligations |
1,050 | 350 | 700 | | | ||||||||||
Other Long Term Obligations |
2,453 | 750 | 874 | 346 | 483 | ||||||||||
Uncertain Tax Position Liabilities |
4,433 | | | | 4,433 | ||||||||||
Total Contractual Cash Obligations (3) |
$ | 820,548 | $ | 44,092 | $ | 82,425 | $ | 75,058 | $ | 618,973 | |||||
(1) | The junior subordinated debentures liquidation value is approximately $108,707. |
(2) | Interest payments for borrowings under the Senior Facilities and with regard to the 10.875% Senior Notes. Interest payments on the variable rate senior term loans were calculated using the actual interest rate of 5.50% as of June 30, 2010 which consisted of a EuroDollar minimum floor rate of 1.75% plus EuroDollar Margin of 3.75%. |
(3) | All of the contractual obligations noted above are reflected on the Companys condensed consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2010 except for the interest payments and operating leases. |
The Company has a purchase agreement with its supplier of key blanks which requires minimum purchases of 100 million key blanks per year. To the extent minimum purchases of key blanks are below 100 million, the Company must pay the supplier $0.0035 per key multiplied by the shortfall. Since the inception of the contract in 1998, the Company has purchased more than the requisite 100 million key blanks per year from the supplier. In 2009, the Company extended this contract for an additional four years.
As of June 30, 2010, the Company had no material purchase commitments for capital expenditures.
Page 31
Table of Contents
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
The Company does not have any off-balance sheet arrangements, as defined in Item 303(a)(4)(ii) of Regulation S-K under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Borrowings
As of June 30, 2010, the Company had $24.5 million available under its secured credit facilities. The Company had approximately $290.1 million of outstanding debt under its secured credit facilities at June 30, 2010, consisting of $290.0 million in a term loan and $0.1 million in capitalized lease obligations. The term loan consisted of a $290.0 million Term B-2 Loan at a three (3) month EuroDollar rate plus margin of 5.50%. The capitalized lease obligations were at various interest rates.
At June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Company borrowings were as follows:
June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||||||||||||
Facility | Outstanding | Interest | Facility | Outstanding | Interest | |||||||||||||
(dollars in 000's) |
Amount | Amount | Rate | Amount | Amount | Rate | ||||||||||||
Term B-1 Loan |
$ | | | $ | 17,992 | 3.02 | % | |||||||||||
Term B-2 Loan |
290,000 | 5.50 | % | 139,857 | 4.77 | % | ||||||||||||
Total Term Loans |
290,000 | 157,849 | ||||||||||||||||
Revolving credit facility |
$ | 30,000 | | | $ | 20,000 | | | ||||||||||
Capital leases & other obligations |
56 | various | 494 | various | ||||||||||||||
Total secured credit |
290,056 | 158,343 | ||||||||||||||||
10.875% Senior notes |
150,000 | 10.875 | % | | | |||||||||||||
Unsecured subordinated notes |
| | 49,820 | 12.50 | % | |||||||||||||
Total borrowings |
$ | 440,056 | $ | 208,163 | ||||||||||||||
On May 28, 2010, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries closed the Senior Facilities, consisting of a $290.0 million term loan and a $30.0 million Revolver. The term loan portion of the Senior Facilities has a six year term and the Revolver has a five year term. The Senior Facilities provide borrowings at interest rates based on a EuroDollar rate plus a margin of 3.75%, or a base rate plus a margin of 2.75%. The EuroDollar rate is subject to a minimum floor of 1.75% and the Base Rate is subject to a minimum floor of 2.75%.
Concurrently with the consummation of the Merger Transaction, The Hillman Group, Inc. issued $150.0 million aggregate principal amount of its 10.875% Senior Notes, which are guaranteed by Hillman and its domestic subsidiaries other than the Hillman Group Capital Trust. Hillman Group pays interest on the 10.875% Senior Notes semi-annually on June 1 and December 1 of each year.
Prior to the consummation of the Merger Transaction, the Company, through Hillman Group, was party to the Old Credit Agreement, consisting of a $20.0 million revolving credit line and a $235.0 million term loan. The facilities under the Old Credit Agreement had a maturity date of March 31, 2012. In addition, the Company, through Hillman Group, had issued $49.8 million in aggregate principal amount of unsecured subordinated notes to a group of investors, including affiliates of AEA Investors LP, CIG & Co. and several private investors that were scheduled to mature on September 30, 2012. In connection with the Merger Agreement, both the Old Credit Agreement and the subordinated note issuance were repaid and terminated.
Page 32
Table of Contents
The Companys Senior Facilities requires the maintenance of certain fixed charge, interest coverage and leverage ratios and limits the ability of the Company to incur debt, make investments, make dividend payments to holders of the Trust Preferred Securities or undertake certain other business activities. Upon the occurrence of an event of default under the credit agreements, all amounts outstanding, together with accrued interest, could be declared immediately due and payable by our lenders. Below are the calculations of the financial covenants with the Senior Facilities requirement for the twelve trailing months ended June 30, 2010:
(dollars in 000's) |
Actual | Ratio Requirement |
|||
Leverage Ratio |
|||||
Adjusted EBITDA (1) |
$ | 85,657 | |||
Senior term loan balance |
290,000 | ||||
Revolver |
| ||||
Capital leases and other credit obligations |
56 | ||||
Senior notes |
150,000 | ||||
Total indebtedness |
$ | 440,056 | |||
Leverage ratio (must be below requirement) |
5.14 | 6.75 | |||
Interest Coverage Ratio |
|||||
Adjusted EBITDA (1) |
$ | 85,657 | |||
Cash interest expense (2) |
$ | 18,656 | |||
Interest coverage ratio (must be above requirement) |
4.59 | 2.00 | |||
Secured Leverage Ratio |
|||||
Senior term loan balance |
$ | 290,000 | |||
Revolver |
| ||||
Capital leases and other credit obligations |
56 | ||||
Total debt |
$ | 290,056 | |||
Adjusted EBITDA (1) |
$ | 85,657 | |||
Leverage ratio (must be below requirement) |
3.39 | 4.50 | |||
(1) | Adjusted EBITDA is defined as income from operations of $14,861, plus depreciation of $16,906, amortization of $7,062, management fees of $939, stock compensation expense of $23,990, transaction costs of $21,714, foreign exchange (gains) or losses of ($362) and other non-recurring expenses of $547. |
(2) | Includes cash interest expense on senior term loans, capitalized lease obligations, senior notes and subordinated notes. |
The Company had deferred tax assets aggregating $32.8 million, net of valuation allowance of $2.8 million, and deferred tax liabilities of $125.8 million as of June 30, 2010, as determined in accordance with ASC Topic 740, Income Taxes. Management believes that the Companys net deferred tax assets will be realized through the reversal of existing temporary differences between the financial statement and tax basis, as well as through future taxable income.
Page 33
Table of Contents
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Significant accounting policies and estimates are summarized in the notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements. Some accounting policies require management to exercise significant judgment in selecting the appropriate assumptions for calculating financial estimates. Such judgments are subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty. These judgments are based on our historical experience, known trends in our industry, terms of existing contracts and other information from outside sources, as appropriate. Management believes these estimates and assumptions are reasonable based on the facts and circumstances as of June 30, 2010, however, actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions and circumstances.
We identified our critical accounting policies in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations found in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, as amended. We believe there have been no changes in these critical accounting policies. We have summarized our critical accounting policies either in the notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements or below:
Revenue Recognition:
Revenue is recognized when products are shipped or delivered to customers depending upon when title and risks of ownership have passed.
The Company offers a variety of sales incentives to its customers primarily in the form of discounts, rebates and slotting fees. Discounts are recognized in the financial statements at the date of the related sale. Rebates are estimated based on the revenue to date and the contractual rebate percentage to be paid. A portion of the estimated cost of the rebate is allocated to each underlying sales transaction. Slotting fees are used on an infrequent basis and are not considered to be significant. Discounts, rebates and slotting fees are included in the determination of net sales.
The Company also establishes reserves for customer returns and allowances. The reserves are established based on historical rates of returns and allowances. The reserves are adjusted quarterly based on actual experience. Returns and allowances are included in the determination of net sales.
Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts:
The Company establishes the allowance for doubtful accounts using the specific identification method and also provides a reserve in the aggregate. The estimates for calculating the aggregate reserve are based on historical information. Increases to the allowance for doubtful accounts result in a corresponding expense. The allowance for doubtful accounts was $522 thousand as of June 30, 2010 and $514 thousand as of December 31, 2009.
Inventory Realization:
Inventories consisting predominantly of finished goods are valued at the lower of cost or market, cost being determined principally on the weighted average cost method. Excess and obsolete inventories are carried at net realizable value. The historical usage rate is the primary factor used by the Company in assessing the net realizable value of excess and obsolete inventory. A reduction in the carrying value of an inventory item from cost to market is recorded for inventory with no usage in the preceding twenty-four month period or with on hand quantities in excess of twenty-four months average usage. The inventory reserve amounts were $8.4 million as of June 30, 2010 and $7.1 million as of December 31, 2009.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets:
Goodwill represents the excess purchase cost over the fair value of net assets of companies acquired in business combinations. Goodwill is an indefinite lived asset and is tested for impairment at least annually or more frequently if a triggering event occurs.
Page 34
Table of Contents
If the carrying amount of goodwill is greater than the fair value, impairment may be present. The Companys independent appraiser, John Cole, CPA, CVA, assesses the value of its goodwill based on a discounted cash flow model and multiple of earnings. Assumptions critical to the Companys fair value estimates under the discounted cash flow model include the discount rate, projected average revenue growth and projected long-term growth rates in the determination of terminal values.
The Company also evaluates indefinite-lived intangible assets (primarily trademarks and trade names) for impairment annually. The Company also tests for impairment if events and circumstances indicate that it is more likely than not that the fair value of an indefinite-lived intangible asset is below its carrying amount. Assumptions critical to the Companys evaluation of indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment include: the discount rate, royalty rates used in its evaluation of trade names, projected average revenue growth, and projected long-term growth rates in the determination of terminal values. An impairment charge is recorded if the carrying amount of an indefinite-lived intangible asset exceeds the estimated fair value on the measurement date.
Long-Lived Assets:
The Company evaluates its long-lived assets for financial impairment and will continue to evaluate them based on the estimated undiscounted future cash flows as events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be fully recoverable. No impairment charges were recognized for long-lived assets in the quarter ended June 30, 2010.
Risk Insurance Reserves:
The Company self insures its product liability, automotive, workers compensation and general liability losses up to $250 thousand per occurrence. Catastrophic coverage has been purchased from third party insurers for occurrences in excess of $250 thousand up to $35 million. The two risk areas involving the most significant accounting estimates are workers compensation and automotive liability. Actuarial valuations performed by the Companys outside risk insurance expert, Insurance Services Office, Inc., were used to form the basis for workers compensation and automotive liability loss reserves. The actuary contemplated the Companys specific loss history, actual claims reported, and industry trends among statistical and other factors to estimate the range of reserves required. Risk insurance reserves are comprised of specific reserves for individual claims and additional amounts expected for development of these claims, as well as for incurred but not yet reported claims. The Company believes the liability recorded for such risk insurance reserves is adequate as of June 30, 2010, but due to judgments inherent in the reserve estimation process it is possible the ultimate costs will differ from this estimate.
The Company self-insures its group health claims up to an annual stop loss limit of $200 thousand per participant. Aggregate coverage is maintained for annual group health insurance claims in excess of 125% of expected claims. Historical group insurance loss experience forms the basis for the recognition of group health insurance reserves. The Company believes the liability recorded for such insurance reserves is adequate as of June 30, 2010, but due to judgments inherent in the reserve estimation process it is possible the ultimate costs will differ from this estimate.
Income Taxes:
Deferred income taxes are computed using the asset and liability method. Under this method, deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between financial reporting and tax basis of assets and liabilities (temporary differences) and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. Valuation allowances are provided for tax benefits where it is more likely than not that certain tax benefits will not be realized. Adjustments to valuation allowances are recorded from changes in utilization of the tax related item. For additional information, see Note 8 of notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
Page 35
Table of Contents
Item 3.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
The Company is exposed to the impact of interest rate changes as borrowings under the Senior Facilities bear interest at variable interest rates. It is the Companys policy to enter into interest rate transactions only to the extent considered necessary to meet objectives.
On August 29, 2008, the Company entered into an Interest Rate Swap Agreement (2008 Swap) with a three year term for a notional amount of $50 million. The 2008 Swap fixed the interest rate at 3.41% plus applicable rate margin. The 2008 Swap was terminated on May 24, 2010.
On June 24, 2010, the Company entered into an Interest Rate Swap Agreement (2010 Swap) with a two-year term for a notional amount of $115,000. The effective date of the 2010 Swap is May 31, 2011 and its termination date is May 31, 2013. The 2010 Swap fixes the interest rate at 2.47% plus applicable interest rate margin.
Based on the Companys exposure to variable rate borrowings at June 30, 2010, a one percent (1%) change in the weighted average interest rate for a period of one year would change the annual interest expense by approximately $2.9 million.
The Company is exposed to foreign exchange rate changes of the Canadian and Mexican currencies as it impacts the $6.2 million net asset value of its Canadian and Mexican subsidiaries as of June 30, 2010. Management considers the Companys exposure to foreign currency translation gains or losses to be immaterial.
Item 4.
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Companys management, including the chief executive officer and the chief financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). Based upon that evaluation, which included the matters discussed below, the Companys chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that, due to a material weakness that the Company identified in its internal control over financial reporting, the Companys disclosure controls and procedures were not effective, as of the end of the period ended June 30, 2010, in ensuring that material information relating to The Hillman Companies, Inc. required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the chief executive officer and the chief financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Page 36
Table of Contents
A material weakness is a control deficiency, or combination of control deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected in a timely manner. Management determined that the Company's internal control over financial reporting was not effective as a result of the material weakness related to the tax position and accounting treatment of the dividends on management owned Preferred and Purchased Options as of December 31, 2009. This control deficiency resulted in the filing of an amendment to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 and restatements of our consolidated balance sheets at December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, our consolidated statements of operations, stockholders equity and cash flows for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007 and the related notes thereto to correct an error in income tax accounting.
Plan for Remediation of Material Weaknesses
Management is in the process of remediating this material weakness in internal control over financial reporting. In particular, management obtained expert tax guidance regarding the deductibility of dividends on the Purchased Preferred Shares and Preferred Stock Options, which supports the position of treating these items as temporary timing differences for accounting purposes. Additionally, any future transactions or events that are deemed by management to be unusually subjective in nature will be thoroughly evaluated by management to determine the necessity of obtaining expert tax guidance. Management will also analyze the periodic assessment of the tax reporting control environment and make any enhancements deemed to be appropriate.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in the Companys internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f)) that occurred during the quarter ended June 30, 2010, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
Page 37
Table of Contents
OTHER INFORMATION
On May 4, 2010, Hy-Ko Products, Inc. filed a complaint against The Hillman Group, Inc. and Kaba Ilco Corp., a manufacturer of blank replacement keys, in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio Eastern Division, alleging that the defendants engaged in violations of federal and state antitrust laws regarding their business practices relating to automatic key machines and replacement keys. Hy-Ko Products May 4, 2010 filing against the Company is based, in part, on the Companys previously-filed claim against Hy-Ko Products alleging infringement of certain patents of the Company. The plaintiff is seeking unspecified monetary damages which would be trebled under the antitrust laws, interest and attorneys fees as well as injunctive relief. Because the lawsuit is in a preliminary stage, it is not yet possible to assess the impact that the lawsuit will have on the Company. However, the Company believes that it has meritorious defenses and intends to defend the lawsuit vigorously.
In addition, legal proceedings are pending which are either in the ordinary course of business or incidental to the Companys business. Those legal proceedings incidental to the business of the Company are generally not covered by insurance or other indemnity. In the opinion of management, the ultimate resolution of the pending litigation matters will not have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position, operations or cash flows of the Company.
There have been no material changes to the risks related to the Company.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
Not Applicable
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.
Not Applicable
Not Applicable
Exhibits, including those incorporated by reference. | ||
3.1 | Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of The Hillman Companies, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 4, 2010) | |
3.2 | Amended and Restated By-Laws of The Hillman Companies, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 4, 2010) | |
4.1* | Indenture, dated May 28, 2010, among The Hillman Group, Inc., each of the Guarantors party thereto and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee. |
Page 38
Table of Contents
4.2* | Registration Rights Agreement, dated May 28, 2010, among the The Hillman Group, Inc., the guarantors listed therein, Barclays Capital Inc. and Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated. | |
10.1* | Credit Agreement, dated as of May 28, 2010, among OHCP HM Acquisition Corp. OHCP HM Merger Sub Corp., The Hillman Companies, Inc., Hillman Investment Company, The Hillman Group, Inc., and the agents and lenders from time to time party thereto. | |
10.2* | Borrower Assumption Agreement, dated as of June 1, 2010, among The Hillman Companies, Inc. The Hillman Group, Inc. and Barclays Bank plc, as Administrative and Collateral Agent. | |
10.3* | Purchase Agreement, dated May 18, 2010, among OHCP HM Merger Sub Corp. and the initial purchasers thereunder. | |
10.4* | Joinder Agreement, dated May 28, 2010, among The Hillman Group, Inc. and the Guarantors party thereto. | |
10.5* | Employment Letter with Max W. Hillman, Jr. | |
10.6* | Employment Letter with Richard P. Hillman | |
10.7* | Employment Letter with James P. Waters | |
10.8* | Employment Agreement, dated April 21, 2010, between The Hillman Group, Inc. and Ali Fartaj | |
31.1 * | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. | |
31.2 * | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. | |
32.1 * | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32.2 * | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
* | Filed herewith. |
Page 39
Table of Contents
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
THE HILLMAN COMPANIES, INC.
/S/ JAMES P. WATERS |
/S/ HAROLD J. WILDER |
|
James P. Waters | Harold J. Wilder | |
Vice President Finance | Controller | |
(Chief Financial Officer) | (Chief Accounting Officer) |
DATE: August 16, 2010
Page 40