Form: 10-Q

Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)

August 11, 2017

Documents


UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended July 1, 2017
Commission file number 1-13293
The Hillman Companies, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
 
23-2874736
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
 
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
10590 Hamilton Avenue
Cincinnati, Ohio
 
45231
(Address of principal executive offices)
 
(Zip Code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (513) 851-4900
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of Class
 
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
11.6% Junior Subordinated Debentures
 
None
Preferred Securities Guaranty                
 
None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    YES  ý    NO  ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    YES  ý    NO  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b‑2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
 
Large accelerated filer
 
¨
  
Accelerated filer
 
¨
Non-accelerated filer
 
ý  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
  
Smaller reporting company
 
¨
Emerging growth company
 
¨
 
 
 
 

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.    YES  ¨    NO  ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    YES  ¨    NO  ý
On August 11, 2017, 5,000 shares of the Registrant’s common stock were issued and outstanding and 4,217,724 Trust Preferred Securities were issued and outstanding by the Hillman Group Capital Trust. The Trust Preferred Securities trade on the NYSE Amex under symbol HLM.Pr.

THE HILLMAN COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

INDEX
 
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
PAGE
 
 
 
Item 1.
 
 
 
 
 
Item 2.
Item 3.
Item 4.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
 
Item 1.
Item 1A.
Item 2.
Item 3.
Item 4.
Item 5.
Item 6.


Page 2 
THE HILLMAN COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)


 
July 1,
2017
 
December 31,
2016
ASSETS
 
 
 
Current assets:
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
$
11,858

 
$
14,106

Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $1,012 ($907 - 2016)
86,240

 
71,082

Inventories, net
230,495

 
220,893

Other current assets
12,300

 
11,486

Total current assets
340,893

 
317,567

Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $86,315 ($74,713 - 2016)
128,642

 
121,028

Goodwill
617,167

 
615,682

Other intangibles, net of accumulated amortization of $113,835 ($94,658 - 2016)
698,550

 
715,812

Other assets
12,853

 
11,547

Total assets
$
1,798,105

 
$
1,781,636

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
 
 
 
Current liabilities:
 
 
 
Accounts payable
$
79,204

 
$
61,906

Current portion of senior term loans
5,500

 
5,500

Current portion of capitalized lease and other obligations
118

 
143

Accrued expenses:
 
 
 
Salaries and wages
7,548

 
8,303

Pricing allowances
4,206

 
4,982

Income and other taxes
4,640

 
3,208

Interest
9,711

 
9,776

Other accrued expenses
15,320

 
11,146

Total current liabilities
126,247

 
104,964

Long term debt
971,785

 
973,455

Deferred income taxes, net
232,369

 
237,312

Other non-current liabilities
8,288

 
7,979

Total liabilities
$
1,338,689

 
$
1,323,710

Commitments and contingencies (Note 5)
 
 
 
Stockholders’ Equity:
 
 
 
Preferred stock, $.01 par, 5,000 shares authorized, none issued or outstanding at July 1, 2017 and December 31, 2016
—

 
—

Common stock, $.01 par, 5,000 shares authorized, issued and outstanding at July 1, 2017 and December 31, 2016
—

 
—

Additional paid-in capital
550,070

 
548,534

Accumulated deficit
(61,705
)
 
(56,226
)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
(28,949
)
 
(34,382
)
Total stockholders’ equity
459,416

 
457,926

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
$
1,798,105

 
$
1,781,636

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


Page 3 
THE HILLMAN COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) (Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands)



 
Thirteen Weeks Ended
July 1, 2017
 
Three Months Ended
June 30, 2016
 
Twenty-six Weeks Ended
July 1, 2017
 
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2016
Net sales
$
224,260

 
$
226,900

 
$
413,039

 
$
416,504

Cost of sales (exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown separately below)
120,253

 
122,175

 
221,847

 
225,283

Selling, general and administrative expenses
67,380

 
66,764

 
133,926

 
132,148

Depreciation
9,455

 
8,050

 
18,173

 
16,420

Amortization
9,470

 
9,491

 
18,942

 
18,954

Management fees to related party
130

 
136

 
263

 
272

Other (income) expense
(930
)
 
259

 
(1,714
)
 
451

Income from operations
18,502

 
20,025

 
21,602

 
22,976

Interest expense, net
12,696

 
12,866

 
25,173

 
25,909

Interest expense on junior subordinated debentures
3,152

 
3,152

 
6,304

 
6,304

Investment income on trust common securities
(94
)
 
(95
)
 
(189
)
 
(189
)
Income (loss) before income taxes
2,748

 
4,102

 
(9,686
)
 
(9,048
)
Income tax expense (benefit)
1,529

 
2,356

 
(4,221
)
 
(2,950
)
Net income (loss)
$
1,219

 
$
1,746

 
$
(5,465
)
 
$
(6,098
)
Net income (loss) from above
$
1,219

 
$
1,746

 
$
(5,465
)
 
$
(6,098
)
Other comprehensive income:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Foreign currency translation adjustments
3,395

 
(190
)
 
5,433

 
5,894

Total other comprehensive income (loss)
3,395

 
(190
)
 
5,433

 
5,894

Comprehensive income (loss)
$
4,614

 
$
1,556

 
$
(32
)
 
$
(204
)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.



Page 4 
THE HILLMAN COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands)

 
Twenty-six Weeks Ended
July 1, 2017
 
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2016
Cash flows from operating activities:
 
 
 
Net loss
$
(5,465
)
 
$
(6,098
)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used for operating activities:
 
 
 
Depreciation and amortization
37,115

 
35,374

Loss on sale of property and equipment
132

 
—

Deferred income taxes
(5,310
)
 
(3,541
)
Deferred financing and original issue discount amortization
1,278

 
1,325

Stock-based compensation expense
1,553

 
1,118

Other non-cash interest and change in value of interest rate swap
(666
)
 
659

Changes in operating items:
 
 
 
Accounts receivable
(14,289
)
 
(14,715
)
Inventories
(7,265
)
 
17,984

Other assets
(1,041
)
 
(3,534
)
Accounts payable
16,805

 
7,695

Other accrued liabilities
5,197

 
339

Other items, net
6

 
(42
)
Net cash provided by operating activities
28,050

 
36,564

Cash flows from investing activities:

 
 
Capital expenditures
(25,251
)
 
(17,352
)
Other items, net
(1,500
)
 
—

Net cash used for investing activities
(26,751
)
 
(17,352
)
Cash flows from financing activities:
 
 
 
Repayments of senior term loans
(2,750
)
 
(2,750
)
Borrowings on revolving credit loans
5,000

 
16,000

Repayments of revolving credit loans
(5,000
)
 
(28,000
)
Principal payments under capitalized lease obligations
(42
)
 
(118
)
Net cash used for financing activities
(2,792
)
 
(14,868
)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
(755
)
 
205

Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
(2,248
)
 
4,549

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
14,106

 
11,385

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$
11,858

 
$
15,934

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
 
 
 
Interest paid on junior subordinated debentures
$
6,115

 
$
6,115

Interest paid
23,725

 
24,679

Income taxes paid
219

 
238


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


Page 5 
THE HILLMAN COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(dollars in thousands)

 

1. Basis of Presentation:
The accompanying unaudited financial statements include the condensed consolidated accounts of The Hillman Companies, Inc. (“Hillman Companies”) and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (collectively “Hillman” or the “Company”). All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements present information in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial information and the instructions to Form 10-Q and applicable rules of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all information or footnotes required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. Management believes that the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring accruals and adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation. Operating results for the twenty-six weeks ended July 1, 2017 do not necessarily indicate the results that may be expected for the full year. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s annual report filed on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.

For fiscal year 2017, the Company has changed from a calendar year ending on December 31 to a 52-53 week fiscal year ending on the last Saturday in December, effective beginning with the first quarter of 2017. In a 52 week fiscal year, each of the Company’s quarterly periods will comprise 13 weeks. The additional week in a 53 week fiscal year is added to the fourth quarter, making such quarter consist of 14 weeks. The Company’s first 53 week fiscal year will occur in fiscal year 2022. The Company made the fiscal year change on a prospective basis and has not adjusted operating results for prior periods. The change does not materially impact the comparability of quarters or year ended 2017 to the quarters or year ended 2016. The adoption of a 52-53 week year was not deemed a change in fiscal year for purposes of reporting subject to Rule 13a-10 or 15d-10; hence, no transition reports are required.

In 2017, the Company completed the integration of its All Points subsidiary into the rest of its United States business. After this transition, discrete financial information for the All Points business is no longer regularly reviewed by the Chief Operating Decision Maker. Accordingly, to align the operating segments with the current way management reviews information to make operating decisions, assess performance, and allocate resources, the results of the Company's All Points business are now reported in the United States operating segment. Additional information on the Company's reportable segments is presented at the "Segment Information" note of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies:
The significant accounting policies should be read in conjunction with the significant accounting policies included in the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.
Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements:
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses for the reporting periods. Actual results may differ from these estimates.
Reclassifications:
Certain amounts in the prior year financial statements, primarily related to the reclassification of segment information and goodwill reporting units, were reclassified to conform to the current year’s presentation. These reclassifications had no impact on the prior periods' net income (loss), cash flows, or stockholders' equity.

Stock Based Compensation:

The Company has a stock-based employee compensation plan pursuant to which Holdco may grant options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, and other stock-based awards. The Company uses a Black-Scholes option pricing model to determine the fair value of stock options on the dates of grant. Stock-based compensation cost is estimated at the grant date based on the fair value of the award and is recognized as expense over the requisite vesting period or performance period of the award on a straight-line basis. The stock-based compensation expense is recorded in general and administrative expenses. 

Page 6 
THE HILLMAN COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(dollars in thousands)

In the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended July 1, 2017, the Company modified the vesting period of the outstanding awards, reducing the vesting period to four years from five years. The modification of the vesting term resulted in $687 of additional expense in the period.

3. Recent Accounting Pronouncements:
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), ("ASU 2014-09") which supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in ASC 605, Revenue Recognition. This ASU is based on the principle that revenue is recognized to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The ASU outlines a five-step model and related application guidance, which replaces most existing revenue recognition guidance. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-14 which deferred the effective date by one year making the guidance effective for us in the fiscal year ending December 31, 2018, and for interim periods within that year. The amendments can be applied retrospectively to each prior reporting period or retrospectively with the cumulative effect of initially applying this standard recognized at the date of initial application. Early adoption is permitted as of the original effective date. The Company is currently assessing the transition method and impact of implementing this guidance on its Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-08, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. This guidance amends the principal-versus-agent implementation guidance and illustrations in ASU 2014-09. This ASU clarifies that an entity should evaluate whether it is the principal or the agent for each specified good or service promised in a contract with a customer. Therefore, for contracts involving more than one specified good or service, the entity may be the principal for one or more specified goods or services and the agent for others. This ASU has the same effective date as the new revenue standard, ASU 2014-09, and entities are required to adopt this ASU by using the same transition method used to adopt the new revenue standard. In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-10, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing. This ASU clarifies the implementation guidance on identifying performance obligations and licensing on the previously issued ASU 2014-09. In May 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-11, Revenue Recognition (Topic 605) and Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Rescission of SEC Guidance Because of Accounting Standards Updates 2014-09 and 2014-16 Pursuant to Staff Announcements at the March 3, 2016 EITF Meeting. ASU No. 2016-11 rescinds several SEC Staff Announcements that are codified in Topic 605, including, among other items, guidance relating to accounting for shipping and handling fees and freight services. In May 2016, the FASB also issued ASU 2016-12, which provided narrow scope improvements and practical expedients related to ASU 2014-09. The improvements address completed contracts and contract modifications at transition, noncash consideration, the presentation of sales taxes and other taxes collected from customers, and assessment of collectability when determining whether a transaction represents a valid contract. Additionally, on December 21, 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-20, Technical Corrections and Improvements to Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which provides disclosure relief, and clarifies the scope and application of the new revenue standard and related cost guidance. ASU No. 2016-10, ASU No. 2016-11, and ASU No. 2016-12 are effective for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2018, and for interim periods within that year. Early adoption is permitted only as of annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within that year. ASU No. 2016-10, ASU No. 2016-11, ASU No. 2016-12, and ASU No. 2016-20 can be adopted either retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented or as a cumulative-effect adjustment as of the date of adoption. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of implementing this guidance on its Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). The amendments in this update require lessees, among other things, to recognize lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet for those leases classified as operating leases under previous authoritative guidance. This update also introduces new disclosure requirements for leasing arrangements. The new guidance will be effective for public business entities for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods therein. Early adoption will be permitted for all entities. The new standard is required to be applied with a modified retrospective approach to each prior reporting period presented with various optional practical expedients. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of implementing this guidance on its Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses. The ASU sets forth a “current expected credit loss” (CECL) model which requires the Company to measure all expected credit losses for financial instruments held at the reporting date based on historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable supportable forecasts. This replaces the existing incurred loss model and is applicable to the measurement of credit losses on financial assets measured at amortized cost and applies to some off-balance sheet credit exposures. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,

Page 7 
THE HILLMAN COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(dollars in thousands)

2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently assessing the impact of the adoption of this ASU on its Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments. The ASU amends the guidance in ACS 230, Statement of Cash Flows, and clarifies how entities should classify certain cash receipts and cash payments on the statement of cash flows with the objective of reducing the existing diversity in practice related to eight specific cash flow issues. The amendments in this update are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2016-15 to have a material impact on its Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-16, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory. The new standard eliminates the exception to the principle in ASC 740 for all intra-entity sales of assets other than inventory to be deferred until the transferred asset is sold to a third party or otherwise recovered through use. This ASU is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2016-16 to have a material impact on its Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business. ASU 2017-01 provides guidance to assist entities in evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. The updated guidance requires a prospective adoption. Early adoption is permitted. The ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company does not expect the provisions of ASU 2017-01 to have a material impact on its Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment. ASU 2017-04 eliminates Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test and instead requires an entity to perform its annual, or interim, goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. The entity should recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value, not to exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to the reporting unit. The updated guidance requires a prospective adoption. Early adoption is permitted. The ASU is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2019.  The Company is in the process of evaluating the effects of the provisions of ASU 2017-04 on its Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
4. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets:    
Goodwill amounts by reporting unit are summarized as follows: 
 
Goodwill at
Acquisitions
Dispositions
Other (1)
Goodwill at
 
December 31, 2016
July 1, 2017
United States
$
583,780

$
—

$
—

$
—

$
583,780

Canada
28,377

—

—

982

29,359

Mexico
3,525

—

—

503

4,028

Total
$
615,682

$
—

$
—

$
1,485

$
617,167

 
(1)
These amounts relate to adjustments resulting from fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates.
Other intangibles, net, as of July 1, 2017 and December 31, 2016 consist of the following: 

Page 8 
THE HILLMAN COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(dollars in thousands)

 
Estimated
Useful Life
(Years)
July 1, 2017
December 31, 2016
Customer relationships
20
$
689,225

$
687,642

Trademarks - All Others
Indefinite
85,596

85,294

Trademarks - TagWorks
5
300

300

KeyWorks license
7
4,446

4,438

Patents
7-12
32,818

32,796

Intangible assets, gross
 
812,385

810,470

Less: Accumulated amortization
 
113,835

94,658

Other intangibles, net
 
$
698,550

$
715,812

The amortization expense for amortizable assets including the adjustments resulting from fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates was $9,470 and $18,942 for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended July 1, 2017, respectively and $9,491 and $18,954 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, respectively.

The Company tests goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment annually. Impairment is also tested when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying values of the assets may be greater than their fair values. During the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended July 1, 2017 and three and six months ended June 30, 2016, the Company did not adjust goodwill or intangible assets to their fair values as a result of any impairment analyses.

5. Commitments and Contingencies:
The Company self-insures its product liability, automotive, workers' compensation, and general liability losses up to $250 per occurrence. Catastrophic coverage has been purchased from third party insurers for occurrences in excess of $250 up to $40,000. Two risk areas involving significant accounting estimates are workers' compensation and automotive liability. Actuarial valuations performed by the Company's outside risk insurance expert were used by the Company's management to form the basis for workers' compensation and automotive liability loss reserves. The actuary contemplated the Company's specific loss history, actual claims reported, and industry trends among statistical and other factors to estimate the range of reserves required. Risk insurance reserves are comprised of specific reserves for individual claims and additional amounts expected for development of these claims, as well as for incurred but not yet reported claims. The Company believes the liability of approximately $2,175 recorded for such risks is adequate as of July 1, 2017.

As of July 1, 2017, the Company has provided certain vendors and insurers letters of credit aggregating $6,359 related to our product purchases and insurance coverage for product liability, workers’ compensation, and general liability.

The Company self-insures group health claims up to an annual stop loss limit of $200 per participant. Aggregate coverage is maintained for annual group health insurance claims in excess of 125% of expected claims. Historical group insurance loss experience forms the basis for the recognition of group health insurance reserves. Provisions for losses expected under these programs are recorded based on an analysis of historical insurance claims data and certain actuarial assumptions. The Company believes the liability of approximately $1,675 recorded for such risks is adequate as of July 1, 2017.

The Company imports large quantities of fastener products which are subject to customs requirements and to tariffs and quotas set by governments through mutual agreements and bilateral actions.  The Company could be subject to penalties and interest if it or its suppliers fail to comply with customs regulations or similar laws.  The U.S. Department of Commerce has selected certain Chinese vendors of nail products for administrative review of compliance with anti-dumping duty and countervailing duty laws.  The Company sourced product from selected vendors during the 2014 through 2016 periods currently open for review, and it is at least reasonably possible that the Company may be subject to additional duties pending the results of the review.  The Company accrues for the duty expense once it is determined to be probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated.  In the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended July 1, 2017, the Company recorded expense of $1,796 and $2,146, respectively for anti-dumping duties, which is included in Cost of Goods Sold on the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income (Loss).

On October 1, 2013, The Hillman Group, Inc. ("Hillman Group") filed a complaint against Minute Key Inc., a manufacturer of fully-automatic, self-service key duplication kiosks, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio (Western Division), seeking a declaratory judgment of non-infringement and invalidity of a U.S. patent issued to Minute Key

Page 9 
THE HILLMAN COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(dollars in thousands)

Inc. on September 10, 2013. Hillman Group's filing against Minute Key Inc. was in response to a letter dated September 10, 2013 in which Minute Key Inc. alleged that Hillman Group's FastKey™ product infringes the newly-issued patent.

On October 23, 2013, Minute Key Inc. filed an answer and counterclaim against the Hillman Group alleging patent infringement. Minute Key Inc. also requested that the court dismiss the Hillman Group's complaint, enter judgment against the Hillman Group that the Company is willfully and deliberately infringing the patent, grant a permanent injunction, and award unspecified monetary damages to Minute Key Inc.

Minute Key Inc. later filed two motions on March 17, 2014 seeking to voluntarily withdraw its counterclaim alleging infringement by Hillman Group and also to dismiss Hillman Group's complaint for non-infringement and invalidity. Shortly after an April 23, 2014 court-ordered mediation, Minute Key Inc. provided Hillman Group with a covenant promising not to sue for infringement of two of its patents against any existing Hillman Group product, including the FastKey™ and Key Express™ products.

Hillman Group filed a motion on May 9, 2014 seeking to add additional claims to the case against Minute Key Inc. under Federal and Ohio state unfair competition statutes. These claims relate to Minute Key Inc.'s business conduct during competition with Hillman Group over a mutual client.

In an August 15, 2014 order, the court granted Minute Key Inc.'s March 17, 2014 motions to dismiss the claims relating to patent infringement and also granted Hillman Group's May 9, 2014 motion to add its unfair competition claims.

Hillman Group formally amended its complaint to add the unfair competition claims on September 4, 2014, and Minute Key Inc. answered on September 29, 2014 without filing any counterclaims. Minute Key Inc. filed a motion on October 1, 2014 to move the case from Cincinnati to either the District of Colorado or the Western District of Arkansas. The court denied that motion on February 3, 2015.

It is not yet possible to assess the impact, if any, that the lawsuit will have on the Company. As a result of the Minute Key Inc. covenant not to sue, however, the Company's FastKey™ and Key Express™ products no longer face any threat of patent infringement liability from two of Minute Key Inc.'s patents. The scope of the lawsuit changed from a bilateral dispute over patent infringement to a lawsuit solely about Minute Key Inc.'s business conduct. Minute Key Inc. filed a motion for summary judgment on February 8, 2016. The court denied that motion on July 8, 2016. Following the denial of Minute Key Inc.’s summary judgment motion, a jury trial was held between August 24, 2016 and September 6, 2016. The jury returned a verdict in Hillman Group’s favor on September 6, 2016 finding that Minute Key Inc.’s actions violated the Federal Lanham Act and the Ohio Deceptive Trade Practices Act. Following this verdict against Minute Key Inc., Hillman Group has filed post-trial motions for recovery of its costs, attorney fees, pre-and post-judgment interest, and an injunction. Minute Key Inc. filed a post-trial motion to set aside the jury verdict. All post-trial motions are pending before the court.

In addition, legal proceedings are pending which are either in the ordinary course of business or incidental to the Company’s business. Those legal proceedings incidental to the business of the Company are generally not covered by insurance or other indemnity. In the opinion of the Company’s management, the ultimate resolution of the pending litigation matters will not have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position, operations, or cash flows of the Company.

6. Related Party Transactions

The Company has recorded aggregate management fee charges and expenses from CCMP Capital Advisors, LLC (“CCMP”)Oak Hill Capital Partners III, L.P., Oak Hill Capital Management Partners III, L.P. and OHCP III HC RO, L.P. (collectively, “Oak Hill Funds”) and $130 and $263 for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended July 1, 2017, respectively and $136 and $272 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, respectively.

Gregory Mann and Gabrielle Mann are employed by Hillman. The Company leases an industrial warehouse and office facility from companies under the control of the Manns. The Company has recorded rental expense for the lease of this facility on an arm’s length basis. The rental expense for the lease of this facility was $89 and $177 for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended July 1, 2017, respectively and $82 and  $164 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, respectively.

The Hillman Group Canada ULC subsidiary of Hillman entered into three leases for five properties containing an industrial warehouse, manufacturing plant, and office facilities on February 19, 2013. The owners of the properties under one lease are

Page 10 
THE HILLMAN COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(dollars in thousands)

relatives of Richard Paulin, who was employed by The Hillman Group Canada ULC until his retirement effective April 30, 2017, and the owner of the properties under the other two leases is a company which is owned by Richard Paulin and certain of his relatives. The Company has recorded rental expense for the three leases on an arm's length basis. The rental expense for the three leases was $153 and $309 for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended July 1, 2017, respectively and $160 and $310 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, respectively.


7. Income Taxes:

Accounting Standards Codification 740 (“ASC 740”) requires companies to apply their estimated annual effective tax rate on a year-to-date basis in each interim period. These rates are derived, in part, from expected annual pre-tax income or loss. In the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended July 1, 2017, the Company applied an estimated annual effective tax rate to the interim period pre-tax income to calculate the income tax expense. Under ASC 740, companies should not apply the estimated annual effective tax rate to interim financial results if the estimated annual effective tax rate is not reliably predictable. In this situation, the interim tax rate should be based on the actual year-to-date results. For the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2016, reliable projections of the Company’s annual effective tax rate were difficult to determine, producing significant variations in the customary relationship between income tax expense and pre-tax book income. As such, the Company recorded income taxes for the period based on actual year-to-date results.

For the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended July 1, 2017, the effective income tax rates were 55.6% and 43.6%. The Company recorded a a tax provision / (benefit) for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended July 1, 2017 of $1,529 and $(4,221), respectively. The effective income tax rate differed from the federal statutory tax rate in the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended July 1, 2017 primarily due to the decrease in the valuation allowance attributable to a foreign subsidiary and certain non-deductible expenses. Additionally, the effective income tax rate differed from the federal statutory tax rate in the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended July 1, 2017 due in part to a tax benefit recorded in the current period from the reconciliation of a prior year’s tax return to the amount reported for tax provision purposes. The remaining differences between the effective income tax rate and the federal statutory rate in the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended July 1, 2017 were due to state and foreign income taxes.

The effective income tax rates were 57.4% and 32.6% for three and six months ended June 30, 2016, respectively. The Company recorded a a tax provision / (benefit) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 of $2,356 and $(2,950), respectively. The effective income tax rate differed from the federal statutory tax rate in the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 due in part to a tax benefit recorded in the current period from the reconciliation of a prior year’s tax return to the amount reported for tax provision purposes. The effective income tax rate differed from the federal statutory rate in the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 due in part to a valuation reserve recorded to offset the deferred tax assets of a foreign subsidiary. The remaining differences between the federal statutory rate and the effective tax rate in the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 were primarily due to state and foreign income taxes.


8. Long Term Debt:

The following table summarizes the Company’s debt:

Page 11 
THE HILLMAN COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(dollars in thousands)

 
July 1, 2017
 
December 31, 2016
Revolving loans
$
—

 
$
—

Senior term loan, due 2020
533,500

 
536,250

6.375% Senior Notes, due 2022
330,000

 
330,000

11.6% Junior Subordinated Debentures - Preferred
105,443

 
105,443

Junior Subordinated Debentures - Common
3,261

 
3,261

Capital leases & other obligations
280

 
322

 
972,484

 
975,276

(Add) unamortized premium on 11.6% Junior Subordinated Debentures
19,366

 
19,936

(Subtract) current portion of long term debt and capital leases
(5,618
)
 
(5,643
)
(Subtract) deferred financing fees
(14,447
)
 
(16,114
)
Total long term debt, net
$
971,785

 
$
973,455


As of July 1, 2017, there was $533,500 outstanding under the Company’s term loan. The interest rate on the term loan was 4.8% at July 1, 2017. As of July 1, 2017, the Company had $0 outstanding under its revolving credit facility along with $6,359 of letters of credit. The Company has approximately $63,641 of available borrowings under the revolving credit facility as a source of liquidity.

Additional information with respect to the fair value of the Company’s fixed rate senior notes and junior subordinated debentures is included in Note 10 - Fair Value Measurements.


9. Derivatives and Hedging:
The Company uses derivative financial instruments to manage our exposures to (1) interest rate fluctuations on our floating rate senior debt and (2) fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. The Company measures those instruments at fair value and recognizes changes in the fair value of derivatives in earnings in the period of change, unless the derivative qualifies as an effective hedge that offsets certain exposures.
Interest Rate Swap Agreements
On September 3, 2014, the Company entered into two forward Interest Rate Swap Agreements (the “2014 Swaps”) with three-year terms for notional amounts of $90,000 and $40,000. The forward start date of the 2014 Swaps was October 1, 2015 and the termination date is September 30, 2018. The 2014 Swaps fix the interest rate at 2.2% plus the applicable interest rate margin of 3.5% for an effective rate of 5.7%.
The total fair value of the interest rate swaps was $1,192 as of July 1, 2017 and was reported on the condensed consolidated balance sheet in other non-current liabilities with an increase in other income recorded in the statement of comprehensive loss for the favorable change of $666 in fair value since December 31, 2016.
The total fair value of the interest rate swaps was $1,858 as of December 31, 2016 and was reported on the condensed consolidated balance sheet in other non-current liabilities.
The Company's interest rate swap agreements did not qualify for hedge accounting treatment because they did not meet the provisions specified in ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging (“ASC 815”). Accordingly, the gain or loss on these derivatives was recognized in current earnings.
Foreign Currency Forward Contracts
During 2015, 2016, and 2017, the Company entered into multiple foreign currency forward contracts. The table below summarizes the maturity dates and the fixed exchange rates of the contracts:

Page 12 
THE HILLMAN COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(dollars in thousands)

 
2015 FX Contracts
 
2016 FX Contracts
 
2017 FX Contracts
Maturity date range:
 
 
 
 
 
   Minimum
February 2015
 
April 2016
 
July 2017
   Maximum
December 2016
 
July 2017
 
April 2018
Fixed exchange rate range:
 
 
 
 
 
   Minimum
1.1384
 
1.2536
 
1.3002
   Maximum
1.3831
 
1.3458
 
1.3546

The purpose of the Company's foreign currency forward contracts is to manage the Company's exposure to fluctuations in the exchange rate of the Canadian dollar.
The total notional amount of contracts outstanding was C$33,106 and C$29,887 as of July 1, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. The total fair value of the outstanding foreign currency forward contracts was $(571) and $616 as of July 1, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively, and was reported on the condensed consolidated balance sheets in other current liabilities and other current assets assets, respectively. An increase in other expense of $1,634, including contracts settled during the twenty-six weeks ended July 1, 2017, was recorded in the statement of comprehensive loss for the unfavorable change in fair value from December 31, 2016.
The Company's foreign currency forward contracts did not qualify for hedge accounting treatment because they did not meet the provisions specified in ASC 815. Accordingly, the gain or loss on these derivatives was recognized in current earnings.
The Company does not enter into derivative transactions for speculative purposes and, therefore, holds no derivative instruments for trading purposes.
Additional information with respect to the fair value of derivative instruments is included in Note 10 - Fair Value Measurements.

10. Fair Value Measurements:
The Company uses the accounting guidance that applies to all assets and liabilities that are being measured and reported on a fair value basis. The guidance defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The guidance also establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. Assets and liabilities carried at fair value are classified and disclosed in one of the following three categories:
Level 1:
 
Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2:
 
Observable market-based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data.
Level 3:
 
Unobservable inputs reflecting the reporting entity’s own assumptions.
The following tables set forth the Company’s financial assets and liabilities that were measured at fair value on a recurring basis during the period, by level, within the fair value hierarchy:
 


Page 13 
THE HILLMAN COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(dollars in thousands)

 
As of July 1, 2017
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Total
Trading securities
$
1,933

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
1,933

Interest rate swaps
—

 
(1,192
)
 
—

 
(1,192
)
Foreign exchange forward contracts
—

 
(571
)
 
—

 
(571
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
As of December 31, 2016
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Total
Trading securities
$
1,787

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
1,787

Interest rate swaps
—

 
(1,858
)
 
—

 
(1,858
)
Foreign exchange forward contracts
—

 
616

 
—

 
616


The fair value of the Company's fixed rate senior notes and junior subordinated debentures as of July 1, 2017 and December 31, 2016 were determined by utilizing current trading prices obtained from indicative market data. As a result, the fair value measurements of the Company's senior term notes and debentures are considered to be Level 2.
 
 
 
July 1, 2017
 
December 31, 2016
 
 
Carrying
Amount
 
Estimated
Fair Value
 
Carrying
Amount
 
Estimated
Fair Value
6.375% Senior Notes
 
$
324,444

 
$
315,150

 
$
323,888

 
$
304,013

Junior Subordinated Debentures
 
128,070

 
147,086

 
128,640

 
139,831


Cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable, and accrued liabilities are reflected in the condensed consolidated financial statements at book value, which approximates fair value, due to the short-term nature of these instruments. The carrying amount of the long-term debt under the revolving credit facility approximates the fair value at July 1, 2017 and December 31, 2016 as the interest rate is variable and approximates current market rates. The Company also believes the carrying amount of the long-term debt under the senior term loan approximates the fair value at July 1, 2017 and December 31, 2016 because, while subject to a minimum LIBOR floor rate, the interest rate approximates current market rates of debt with similar terms and comparable credit risk.

11. Segment Reporting:
The Company’s segment reporting structure uses the Company’s management reporting structure as the foundation for how the Company manages its business. The Company periodically evaluates its segment reporting structure in accordance with ASC 350-20-55 and has concluded that it has three reportable segments as of July 1, 2017: The United States, Canada, and All Other. The United States segment and the Canada segment are considered material by the Company’s management as of July 1, 2017. The Company's other segments have been combined in the "All Other" category. In 2017, the Company completed the integration of its All Points subsidiary with the U.S. segment. After this transition, discrete financial information for the All Points business is no longer regularly reviewed by the Chief Operating Decision Maker. Accordingly, to align the operating segments with the current way management reviews information to make operating decisions, assess performance, and allocate resources, the results of the Company's All Points business are now reported in the United States operating segment. The Company evaluates the performance of its segments based on revenue and income from operations, and does not include segment assets or nonoperating income/expense items for management reporting purposes.

The table below presents revenues and income (loss) from operations for our reportable segments for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended July 1, 2017 and three and six months ended June 30, 2016.
 


Page 14 
THE HILLMAN COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(dollars in thousands)

 
 
Thirteen Weeks Ended
July 1, 2017
 
Three Months Ended
June 30, 2016
 
Twenty-six Weeks Ended
July 1, 2017
 
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2016
Revenues
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
United States
 
$
182,854

 
$
185,092

 
$
340,852

 
$
344,675

Canada
 
39,830

 
40,166

 
68,862

 
68,299

All Other
 
1,576

 
1,642

 
3,325

 
3,530

Total revenues
 
$
224,260

 
$
226,900

 
$
413,039

 
$
416,504

Segment income (loss) from operations
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
United States
 
$
14,785

 
$
18,113

 
$
19,387

 
$
21,359

Canada
 
3,650

 
2,503

 
1,660

 
1,763

All Other
 
67

 
(591
)
 
555

 
(146
)
Total income from operations
 
$
18,502

 
$
20,025

 
$
21,602

 
$
22,976




Item 2.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion provides information which the Company’s management believes is relevant to an assessment and understanding of the Company’s operations and financial condition. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the condensed consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes in addition to the consolidated statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.
Forward-Looking Statements

Certain disclosures related to acquisitions, refinancing, capital expenditures, resolution of pending litigation, and realization of deferred tax assets contained in this quarterly report involve substantial risks and uncertainties and may constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, as amended. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “would,” “expect,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “continue,” “project,” or the negative of such terms or other similar expressions.
These forward-looking statements are not historical facts, but rather are based on management’s current expectations, assumptions, and projections about future events. Although management believes that the expectations, assumptions, and projections on which these forward-looking statements are based are reasonable, they nonetheless could prove to be inaccurate, and as a result, the forward-looking statements based on those expectations, assumptions, and projections also could be inaccurate. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance. Instead, forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and assumptions that may cause the Company’s strategy, planning, actual results, levels of activity, performance, or achievements to be materially different from any strategy, planning, future results, levels of activity, performance, or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Actual results could differ materially from those currently anticipated as a result of a number of factors, including the risks and uncertainties discussed under the caption “Risk Factors” set forth in Item 1A of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016. Given these uncertainties, current or prospective investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements.
All forward-looking statements attributable to the Company or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements included in this report and the risks and uncertainties discussed under the caption “Risk Factors” set forth in Item 1A of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016; they should not be regarded as a representation by the Company or any other individual. We undertake no obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise. In light of these risks, uncertainties, and assumptions, the forward-looking events discussed in this report might not occur or be materially different from those discussed.

General

Page 15 


The Hillman Companies, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (collectively, "Hillman" or "Company") are one of the largest providers of hardware-related products and related merchandising services to retail markets in North America. Our principal business is operated through the wholly-owned subsidiary, The Hillman Group, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (collectively, “Hillman Group”). Hillman Group sells its products to hardware stores, home centers, mass merchants, pet supply stores, and other retail outlets principally in the United States, Canada, Mexico, Latin America, and the Caribbean. Product lines include thousands of small parts such as fasteners and related hardware items; threaded rod and metal shapes; keys, key duplication systems, and accessories; builder's hardware; and identification items, such as tags and letters, numbers, and signs. We support our product sales with services that include design and installation of merchandising systems and maintenance of appropriate in-store inventory levels.

For fiscal year 2017, we have changed from a calendar year ending on December 31 to a 52-53 week fiscal year ending on the last Saturday in December, effective beginning with the first quarter of 2017. In a 52 week fiscal year, each of our quarterly periods will comprise 13 weeks. The additional week in a 53 week fiscal year is added to the fourth quarter, making such quarter consist of 14 weeks. Our first 53 week fiscal year will occur in fiscal year 2022. We have made the fiscal year change on a prospective basis and have not adjusted operating results for prior periods. The change does not materially impact the comparability of quarters or year ended 2017 to the quarters or year ended 2016. The adoption of a 52-53 week year was not deemed a change in fiscal year for purposes of reporting subject to Rule 13a-10 or 15d-10; hence, no transition reports are required.

In 2017, we completed the integration of our All Points subsidiary with the U.S. segment. After this transition, discrete financial information for the All Points business is no longer regularly reviewed by the Chief Operating Decision Maker. Accordingly, to align the operating segments with the current way we review information to make operating decisions, assess performance, and allocate resources, the results of our All Points business are now reported in the United States operating segment. Additional information on our reportable segments is presented at the "Segment Information" note of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. Certain reclassifications of prior year amounts, primarily related to the reclassification of segment information and goodwill reporting units, have been made to conform to the current year presentation.  

Current Economic Conditions

Our business is impacted by general economic conditions in the North American and international markets, particularly the U.S. and Canadian retail markets including hardware stores, home centers, mass merchants, and other retailers.
We are exposed to the risk of unfavorable changes in foreign currency exchange rates for the U.S. dollar versus local currency of our suppliers located primarily in China and Taiwan. We purchase a significant variety of our products for resale from multiple vendors located in China and Taiwan. The purchase price of these products is routinely negotiated in U.S. dollar amounts rather than the local currency of the vendors and our suppliers' profit margins decrease when the U.S. dollar declines in value relative to the local currency. This puts pressure on our suppliers to increase prices to us. The U.S. dollar increased in value relative to the RMB by approximately 4.4% in 2015, increased by 7.2% in 2016, and decreased by 2.4% during the period ended July 1, 2017. The U.S. dollar increased in value relative to the Taiwan dollar by approximately 3.8% in 2015, declined by 1.2% in 2016, and declined by 6.2% during the period ended July 1, 2017.
In addition, the negotiated purchase price of our products may be dependent upon market fluctuations in the cost of raw materials such as steel, zinc, and nickel used by our vendors in their manufacturing processes. The final purchase cost of our products may also be dependent upon inflation or deflation in the local economies of vendors in China and Taiwan that could impact the cost of labor used in the manufacturing of our products. We identify the directional impact of changes in our product cost, but the quantification of each of these variable impacts cannot be measured as to the individual impact on our product cost with a sufficient level of precision.
We are also exposed to risk of unfavorable changes in the Canadian dollar exchange rate versus the U.S. dollar. Our sales in Canada are denominated in Canadian dollars while a majority of the products are sourced in U.S. dollars. A weakening of the Canadian dollar versus the U.S. dollar results in lower sales in terms of U.S. dollars while the cost of sales remains unchanged. We have a practice of hedging some of our Canadian subsidiary's purchases denominated in U.S. dollars. The U.S. dollar increased in value relative to the Canadian dollar by approximately 19.3% in 2015, decreased by 3.0% in 2016, and decreased by 3.4% during the period ended July 1, 2017. In response, we implemented price increases in the Canada operating segment during 2015 and 2016. We may take future pricing action, when warranted, in an attempt to offset a portion of product cost increases. The ability of our operating divisions to institute price increases and seek price concessions, as appropriate, is dependent on competitive market conditions.

Page 16 



Results of Operations
The following analysis of results of operations includes a brief discussion of the factors that affected our operating results and a comparative analysis of the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended July 1, 2017 and the three and six months ended June 30, 2016.
Thirteen Week Period Ended July 1, 2017 vs the Three Month Period Ended June 30, 2016

 
Thirteen Weeks Ended
July 1, 2017
 
Three Months Ended
June 30, 2016
(dollars in thousands)
Amount
 
% of
Net Sales
 
Amount
 
% of
Net Sales
Net sales
$
224,260

 
100.0
 %
 
$
226,900

 
100.0
%
Cost of sales (exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown separately below)
120,253

 
53.6
 %
 
122,175

 
53.8
%
Selling, general and administrative expenses
67,380

 
30.0
 %
 
66,764

 
29.4
%
Depreciation
9,455

 
4.2
 %
 
8,050

 
3.5
%
Amortization
9,470

 
4.2
 %
 
9,491

 
4.2
%
Other (income) expense
(800
)
 
(0.4
)%
 
395

 
0.2
%
Income from operations
18,502

 
8.3
 %
 
20,025

 
8.8
%
Interest expense, net of investment income
15,754

 
7.0
 %
 
15,923

 
7.0
%
Income before income taxes
2,748

 
1.2
 %
 
4,102

 
1.8
%
Income tax expense
1,529

 
0.7
 %
 
2,356

 
1.0
%
Net income
$
1,219

 
0.5
 %
 
$
1,746

 
0.8
%
 
Net Sales
Net sales for the second quarter of 2017 were $224.3 million, a decrease of approximately $2.6 million compared to net sales of $226.9 million for the second quarter of 2016. The decrease from prior year was primarily driven by the timing of a rollout to a new automotive customer in the second quarter of 2016 and inventory reductions by a large customer in 2017.
Cost of Sales
Our cost of sales was $120.3 million, or 53.6% of net sales, in the second quarter of 2017, a decrease of approximately $1.9 million compared to $122.2 million, or 53.8% of net sales, in the second quarter of 2016. The decrease of 0.2% in cost of sales, expressed as a percent of net sales, in the second quarter of 2017 compared to the second quarter of 2016 was primarily due to lower freight costs and product mix offset by $1.8 million of additional expense in the second quarter of 2017 for anti-dumping duties associated with nails imported from China from 2014 through 2016.
Expenses
Selling, general, and administrative ("SG&A") expenses were approximately $67.4 million in the thirteen weeks ended July 1, 2017, an increase of approximately $0.6 million, compared to $66.8 million in the three months ended June 30, 2016. The following changes in underlying trends impacted the change in operating expenses:

•
Selling expense was $28.8 million in the second quarter of 2017, a decrease of $0.6 million compared to $29.3 million in the second quarter of 2016. The decrease in selling expense was primarily due to lower medical costs in the second quarter of 2017 and higher costs associated with the timing of a rollout to a new automotive customer in the second quarter of 2016.


Page 17 

•
Warehouse and delivery expenses were $28.1 million in the second quarter of 2017, an increase of $0.4 million compared to $27.7 million in the second quarter of 2016 due to higher labor expense as we work to optimize the distribution network after the opening of our West Coast hub earlier this year.

•
General and administrative (“G&A”) expenses were $10.5 million in the second quarter of 2017, an increase of $0.8 million compared to $9.7 million in the second quarter of 2016. The increase was driven by severance costs related to restructuring activities in Canada and higher stock compensation expense.

Depreciation expense was $9.5 million in the second quarter of 2017 as compared to depreciation expense of $8.1 million in the second quarter of 2016. The increase in depreciation expense was primarily due to capital expenditures for key and engraving machines and software related to our ERP system. Amortization expense of $9.5 million in the second quarter of 2017 was consistent with the amortization expense in the second quarter of 2016.

Other income was $0.8 million in the second quarter of 2017 compared to other expense of $0.4 million in the second quarter of 2016. In the second quarter of 2017, we recorded an exchange rate gain of $0.7 million. In the second quarter of 2016, we recorded exchange rate losses of $0.3 million. Additionally, in the second quarter of 2017, we recorded a gain of $0.2 million on the mark to market adjustments on the interest rate swaps. In the second quarter of 2016, the mark to market adjustment was immaterial.

Twenty-six Week Period Ended July 1, 2017 vs the Six Month Period Ended June 30, 2016

 
Twenty-six Weeks Ended
July 1, 2017
 
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2016
(dollars in thousands)
Amount
 
% of
Net Sales
 
Amount
 
% of
Net Sales
Net sales
$
413,039

 
100.0
 %
 
$
416,504

 
100.0
 %
Cost of sales (exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown separately below)
221,847

 
53.7
 %
 
225,283

 
54.1
 %
Selling, general and administrative expenses
133,926

 
32.4
 %
 
132,148

 
31.7
 %
Depreciation
18,173

 
4.4
 %
 
16,420

 
3.9
 %
Amortization
18,942

 
4.6
 %
 
18,954

 
4.6
 %
Other (income) expense
(1,451
)
 
(0.4
)%
 
723

 
0.2
 %
Income from operations
21,602

 
5.2
 %
 
22,976

 
5.5
 %
Interest expense, net of investment income
31,288

 
7.6
 %
 
32,024

 
7.7
 %
Loss before income taxes
(9,686
)
 
(2.3
)%
 
(9,048
)
 
(2.2
)%
Income tax benefit
(4,221
)
 
(1.0
)%
 
(2,950
)
 
(0.7
)%
Net (loss)
$
(5,465
)
 
(1.3
)%
 
$
(6,098
)
 
(1.5
)%
 

Net Sales
Net sales for the twenty-six weeks ended July 1, 2017 were $413.0 million, a decrease of approximately $3.5 million compared to net sales of $416.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016. The decrease from prior year was primarily driven by the timing of customer and product rollouts in the six months ended June 30, 2016 and inventory reductions by a large customer in the twenty-six weeks ended July 1, 2017. Additionally, market softness with the traditional customers was offset by growth with big box retail customers.
Cost of Sales
Our cost of sales was $221.8 million, or 53.7% of net sales, in the twenty-six weeks ended July 1, 2017, a decrease of approximately $3.4 million compared to $225.3 million, or 54.1% of net sales, in the six months ended June 30, 2016. The

Page 18 

decrease of 0.4% in cost of sales, expressed as a percent of net sales, in the twenty-six weeks ended July 1, 2017 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2016 was primarily due to lower freight costs and product mix partially offset by $2.1 million of additional expense in the twenty-six weeks ended July 1, 2017 for anti-dumping duties associated with nails imported from China from 2014 through 2016.
Expenses
SG&A expenses were approximately $133.9 million in the twenty-six weeks ended July 1, 2017, an increase of approximately $1.8 million, compared to $132.1 million in the six months ended June 30, 2016. The following changes in underlying trends impacted the change in operating expenses:

•
Selling expense was $58.0 million in the twenty-six weeks ended July 1, 2017, a decrease of $1.2 million compared to $59.2 million in the six months ended June 30, 2016. The decrease in selling expense was primarily due to lower medical claims in the twenty-six weeks ended July 1, 2017 and higher costs associated with product and customer rollouts in the six months ended June 30, 2016.

•
Warehouse and delivery expenses were $54.5 million in the twenty-six weeks ended July 1, 2017, an increase of $1.7 million compared to $52.8 million in the six months ended June 30, 2016. We incurred approximately $1.8 million of warehouse expense in first quarter of 2017 associated with starting operations of a West Coast hub which we expect to provide leverage and distribution efficiency. These costs are comprised primarily of rent, freight, and payroll and related costs. This was partially offset by lower medical claims and a reduction in outside storage costs as we begin to exit certain off site warehouses.

•
General and administrative (“G&A”) expenses were $21.4 million in the twenty-six weeks ended July 1, 2017, an increase of $1.2 million compared to $20.2 million in the six months ended June 30, 2016. The increase was driven by severance costs related to restructuring activities in our Canada segment.

Depreciation expense was $18.2 million in the twenty-six weeks ended July 1, 2017 as compared to depreciation expense of $16.4 million in the six months ended June 30, 2016. The increase in depreciation expense was primarily due to capital expenditures for key and engraving machines and software related to our ERP system. Amortization expense of $18.9 million in the twenty-six weeks ended July 1, 2017 was consistent with the amortization expense in the six months ended June 30, 2016.

Other income was $1.5 million in the twenty-six weeks ended July 1, 2017 compared to other expense of $0.7 million in the six months ended June 30, 2016. In the twenty-six weeks ended July 1, 2017, we recorded a gain of $0.7 million on the mark to market adjustments on the interest rate swaps. In the six months ended June 30, 2016 we recorded losses of $0.7 million on the mark to market adjustments on the interest rate swaps. Additionally, in the twenty-six weeks ended July 1, 2017, we recorded an exchange rate gain of $1.0 million. In the six months ended June 30, 2016, we recorded an exchange rate gain of $0.2 million.

Results of Operations – Operating Segments

The following table provides supplemental information regarding our net sales and profitability by operating segment for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended July 1, 2017 and three and six months ended June 30, 2016 (dollars in thousands):
 

Page 19 

 
 
Thirteen Weeks Ended
July 1, 2017
 
Three Months Ended
June 30, 2016
 
Twenty-six Weeks Ended
July 1, 2017
 
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2016
Revenues
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
United States
 
$
182,854

 
$
185,092

 
$
340,852

 
$
344,675

Canada
 
39,830

 
40,166

 
68,862

 
68,299

All Other
 
1,576

 
1,642

 
3,325

 
3,530

Total revenues
 
$
224,260

 
$
226,900

 
$
413,039

 
$
416,504

Segment income (loss) from operations
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
United States
 
$
14,785

 
$
18,113

 
$
19,387

 
$
21,359

Canada
 
3,650

 
2,503

 
1,660

 
1,763

All Other
 
67

 
(591
)
 
555

 
(146
)
Total income from operations
 
$
18,502

 
$
20,025

 
$
21,602

 
$
22,976

The Thirteen Week Period Ended July 1, 2017 vs the Three Month Period Ended June 30, 2016

Net Sales
Net sales for the thirteen weeks ended July 1, 2017 decreased $2.6 million compared to the net sales for the three months ended June 30, 2016. For the United States operating segment, net sales decreased by $2.2 million due to the timing of a rollout to a new automotive customer in the second quarter of 2016 and inventory reductions by one of our customers. Net sales for our Canada operating segment decreased by $0.3 million primarily as a result of the unfavorable conversion of the local currency to U.S. dollars.

Income from Operations
Income from operations for the thirteen weeks ended July 1, 2017 decreased $1.5 million compared to income from operations for the three months ended June 30, 2016.

Income from operations of our United States segment decreased by approximately $3.3 million in the thirteen weeks ended July 1, 2017 to $14.8 million as compared to $18.1 million in the three months ended June 30, 2016. The decrease was the result of lower sales, higher depreciation expenses and higher SG&A costs. Cost of sales expressed as a percentage of sales was consistent with the prior year at 51.0% as lower freight costs and product mix were offset by $1.8 million of additional expense in the second quarter of 2017 for anti-dumping duties associated with nails imported from China from 2014 through 2016. Depreciation expense was $1.4 million higher in the thirteen weeks ended July 1, 2017 due to capital expenditures for key and engraving machines and software related to our ERP system. SG&A was $1.0 million higher than the prior year due to higher warehousing costs associated with the optimization of our distribution network after the opening of our West Coast hub earlier this year.

Income from operations in our Canada segment increased by $1.1 million in the thirteen weeks ended July 1, 2017 to $3.7 million as compared to $2.5 million in the three months ended June 30, 2016. Despite a slight decrease in sales in the Canada segment, income from operations increased due to improved gross margins. Cost of goods sold as a percentage of sales was 65.1% in the second quarter of 2017 as compared to 66.3% in the second quarter of 2016 due to price increases implemented in 2016. Additionally, the Canada segment recorded foreign currency exchange gains of $0.6 million in the thirteen weeks ended July 1, 2017 as compared to immaterial expense in the three months ended June 30, 2016.
The Twenty-six Week Period Ended July 1, 2017 vs the Six Month Period Ended June 30, 2016

Net Sales
Net sales for the twenty-six weeks ended July 1, 2017 decreased $3.5 million compared to the net sales for the six months ended June 30, 2016. For the United States operating segment, net sales decreased by $3.8 million due to large customer and product rollouts in 2016 and inventory reductions by a large customer in the twenty-six weeks ended July 1, 2017. Additionally,

Page 20 

market softness with the traditional customers was offset by growth with big box retail customers. Net sales for our Canada operating segment increased by $0.6 million primarily as a result of growth with big box retailers in 2017 and price increases implemented in 2016, partially offset by unfavorable conversion of local currency to the U.S. dollar.

Income from Operations
Income from operations for the twenty-six weeks ended July 1, 2017 decreased $1.4 million compared to income from operations for the six months ended June 30, 2016.

Income from operations of our United States segment decreased by approximately $2.0 million in the twenty-six weeks ended July 1, 2017 to $19.4 million as compared to $21.4 million in the comparable prior year period. The decrease was the result of lower sales, higher SG&A costs, and higher depreciation expense partially offset by gains on interest rate swaps and lower cost of good sold as percentage of net sales. Our cost of good sold was 51.1% of net sales for the twenty-six weeks ended July 1, 2017 compared to 51.4% of net sales for the six months ended June 30, 2016 primarily due to lower freight costs and product mix partially offset by $2.1 million of additional expense in the twenty-six weeks ended July 1, 2017 for anti-dumping duties associated with nails imported from China from 2014 through 2016. SG&A expenses were $0.8 million higher in the twenty-six weeks ended July 1, 2017 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2016 primarily due to $1.8 million of warehouse expense incurred in the first quarter of 2017 associated with starting operations of a West Coast hub which we expect to provide leverage and distribution efficiency. These costs are comprised primarily of rent, freight, and payroll and related costs. This was partially offset by lower medical claims and a reduction in outside storage costs as we begin to exit certain off site warehouses. Depreciation expense was $1.8 million higher in the United States segment in the twenty-six weeks ended July 1, 2017 due to capital expenditures for key and engraving machines and software related to our ERP system. In the twenty-six weeks ended July 1, 2017, we recorded a gain of $0.7 million on the mark to market adjustments on the interest rate swaps. In the six months ended June 30, 2016 we recorded losses of $0.7 million on the mark to market adjustments on the interest rate swaps.

Income from operations in our Canada segment decreased by $0.1 million in the twenty-six weeks ended July 1, 2017 to $1.7 million as compared to $1.8 million in the six months ended June 30, 2016. The decrease was primarily due to restructuring in the Canada segment which was offset by improved product margin driven by price increases implemented in 2016.

Income Taxes

In the thirteen weeks ended July 1, 2017, we recorded an income tax provision of $1.5 million on pre-tax income of $2.7 million. In the twenty-six weeks ended July 1, 2017, we recorded an income tax benefit of $4.2 million on pre-tax loss of $9.7 million.The effective income tax rates were 55.6% and 43.6% for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended July 1, 2017.

In the three months ended June 30, 2016, we recorded an income tax provision of $2.4 million on a pre-tax income of $4.1 million. In the six months ended June 30, 2016, we recorded an income tax benefit of $3.0 million on a pre-tax loss of $9.0 million. The effective income tax rates were 57.4% and 32.6% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016.

The effective income tax rate differed from the federal statutory tax rate in the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended July 1, 2017 primarily due to the decrease in the valuation allowance attributable to a foreign subsidiary and certain non-deductible expenses. The effective income tax rate differed from the federal statutory tax rate in the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended July 1, 2017 due in part to a tax benefit recorded in the current period from the reconciliation of a prior year’s tax return to the amount reported for tax provision purposes. The remaining differences between the effective income tax rate and the federal statutory rate in the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended July 1, 2017 were due to state and foreign income taxes.

The difference between the effective income tax rate and the federal statutory rate in the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 was affected by a valuation reserve recorded to offset the deferred tax assets of a foreign subsidiary. The effective income tax rate in the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 was also affected by the benefit recorded to reconcile a foreign subsidiary’s 2015 income tax return as filed to the tax provision recorded for financial statement purposes. The net effect of the reconciliation was recorded in the current period as required by the accounting standard. The remaining differences between the effective income tax rate and the federal statutory rate in the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 were primarily due to state and foreign income taxes.

Liquidity and Capital Resources


Page 21 

The statements of cash flows reflect the changes in cash and cash equivalents for the twenty-six weeks ended July 1, 2017 and six months ended June 30, 2016 by classifying transactions into three major categories: operating, investing, and financing activities.

Net cash provided by operating activities for the twenty-six weeks ended July 1, 2017 was $28.1 million as compared to $36.6 million in the comparable prior year period. Operating cash flows for the twenty-six weeks ended July 1, 2017 were unfavorably impacted by an increase in inventory related to the build up of inventory for peak selling season and an increase in accounts receivable due to higher sales. This was partially offset by an increase in accounts payable associated with inventory purchases. Operating cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2016 were favorably impacted by a reduction in inventory related to our focus on improving net working capital. This was partially offset by an increase in accounts receivable due to higher sales.

Net cash used by investing activities was $26.8 million and $17.4 million for the twenty-six weeks ended July 1, 2017 and six months ended June 30, 2016, respectively. The primary use of cash in both periods was our investment in new, state of the art key cutting technology, the KeyKrafter™, as well as engraving machines and the implementation of our ERP system in Canada.

Net cash used by financing activities was $2.8 million for the twenty-six weeks ended July 1, 2017. We used cash to pay $2.8 million in principal payments on the senior term loan under the Senior Facilities.

Net cash used by financing activities was $14.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016. The borrowings on revolving credit loans provided $16.0 million. We used cash to pay $2.8 million in principal payments on the senior term loan under the Senior Facilities, $28.0 million in payments on the revolving credit loans, and $0.1 million in principal payments under capitalized lease obligations.

Management believes that projected cash flows from operations and revolver availability will be sufficient to fund working capital and capital expenditure needs for the next 12 months. Our working capital (current assets minus current liabilities) position of $214.6 million as of July 1, 2017 represents an increase of $2.0 million from the December 31, 2016 level of $212.6 million.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements, as defined in Item 303(a)(4)(ii) of Regulation S-K under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).

Debt Covenants

Terms of the Senior Facilities subject the Company to a revolving facility test condition whereby a senior secured leverage ratio covenant of no greater than 6.5 times the last twelve months Credit Agreement Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA comes into effect if more than 35.0% of the total Revolver commitment is drawn or utilized in letters of credit at the end of a fiscal quarter. If this covenant comes into effect, it may restrict the Company’s ability to incur debt, make investments, pay interest on the Junior Subordinated Debentures, or undertake certain other business activities. As of July 1, 2017, the total revolving credit commitment of the Company was 9.1% utilized and the senior secured leverage ratio covenant was not in effect. Below are the calculations of the financial covenant with the Senior Facilities requirement for the twelve trailing months ended July 1, 2017:

Page 22 

(dollars in thousands)
 
Actual
 
Ratio Requirement
Secured Leverage Ratio
 
 
 
 
Term B-2 Loan
 
$
533,500

 
 
Revolving credit facility
 
—

 
 
Capital leases & other obligations
 
280

 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
 
(11,858
)
 
 
Total senior debt
 
521,922

 
 
Credit Agreement Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA (1)
 
125,224

 
 
Leverage ratio (must be below requirement)
 
4.17
 
6.50
(1) Credit Agreement Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA for the twelve months ended July 1, 2017 is presented in the following Adjusted EBITDA section.

Credit Agreement Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA

Adjusted EBITDA is not a presentation made in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). It should not be considered an alternative to GAAP-based net income or income from operations or operating cash flows. Further, because not all companies use identical calculations, amounts reflected by us as Adjusted EBITDA may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies. Management believes the information shown below is relevant as it presents the amounts used to calculate our leverage ratio covenant which is provided to our lenders. Non-compliance with our debt covenant could result in the requirement to immediately repay all amounts outstanding under such agreements.

The reconciliation of Net Income (Loss) to Adjusted EBITDA for the twenty-six weeks ended July 1, 2017 and six months ended June 30, 2016 and reconciliation of Net Income (Loss) to Credit Agreement Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA for the year ended December 31, 2016 and the twelve trailing months ("TTM") ended July 1, 2017 and June 30, 2016 follows:

Page 23 

 
 
 
Thirteen Weeks Ended
Three Months Ended
Twenty-six Weeks Ended
Six Months Ended
Year
TTM
TTM
 
 
 
July 1,
June 30,
July 1,
June 30,
Ended
July 1,
June 30,
 
 
 
2017
2016
2017
2016
2016
2017
2016
Net income (loss)
 
$
1,219

$
1,746

$
(5,465
)
$
(6,098
)
$
(14,206
)
$
(13,573
)
$
(14,773
)
Income tax provision (benefit)
 
1,529

2,356

(4,221
)
(2,950
)
(7,690
)
(8,961
)
(12,598
)
Interest expense, net
 
12,696

12,866

25,173

25,909

51,181

50,445

51,249

Interest expense on junior subordinated debentures
 
3,152

3,152

6,304

6,304

12,608

12,608

12,608

Investment income on trust common securities
 
(94
)
(95
)
(189
)
(189
)
(378
)
(378
)
(378
)
Depreciation
 
9,455

8,050

18,173

16,420

32,245

33,998

30,939

Amortization
 
9,470

9,491

18,942

18,954

37,905

37,893

37,922

EBITDA
 
37,427

37,566

58,717

58,350

111,665

112,032

104,969

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   Stock compensation expense
 
955

524

1,553

1,118

2,280

2,715

2,151

   Management fees
 
130

136

263

272

550

541

596

   Foreign exchange (gain) loss
 
(335
)
(85
)
(566
)
203

73

(696
)
4,452

   Legal fees and settlements
 
65

379

65

866

2,886

2,085

1,721

   Restructuring and other costs
 
657

174

4,268

608

4,771

8,431

4,922

   Anti-dumping duties
 
1,796

—

2,146

—

—

2,146

—

   Other adjustments
 
(207
)
18

(666
)
659

(705
)
(2,030
)
1,151

Adjusted EBITDA
 
$
40,488

$
38,712

$
65,780

$
62,076

$
121,520

$
125,224

$
119,962

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2015 costs to enter NDD market (1)
 
—

—

—

—

—

—

3,168

2015 costs to secure Canadian Tire Company new business
 
—

—

—

—

—

—

1,855

Credit Agreement Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA (2)
 
$
40,488

$
38,712

$
65,780

$
62,076

$
121,520

$
125,224

$
124,985


1) Represents the amounts spent on airfreight, other expedited delivery costs, and higher domestic sourcing costs to procure construction fastener product ("CFP") for our entrance into the CFP market.

2) Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA calculated in accordance with the Credit Agreement.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Significant accounting policies and estimates are summarized in the notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements. Some accounting policies require management to exercise significant judgment in selecting the appropriate assumptions for calculating financial estimates. Such judgments are subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty. These judgments are based on our historical experience, known trends in our industry, terms of existing contracts, and other information from outside sources, as appropriate. Management believes that these estimates and assumptions are reasonable based on the facts and circumstances as of July 1, 2017, however, actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions and circumstances.
There have been no material changes to our critical accounting policies and estimates which are discussed in the “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates” section of “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Part II, Item 7 of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. In addition, our most significant accounting policies are discussed in Note 2 and elsewhere in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.


Page 24 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

See “Note 3 - Recent Accounting Pronouncements” of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Item 3.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Interest Rate Exposure
We are exposed to the impact of interest rate changes as borrowings under the Senior Facilities bear interest at variable interest rates. It is our policy to enter into interest rate swap and interest rate cap transactions only to the extent considered necessary to meet our objectives.
Based on our exposure to variable rate borrowings at July 1, 2017, after consideration of our LIBOR floor rate and interest rate swap agreements, a one percent (1%) change in the weighted average interest rate for a period of one year would change the annual interest expense by approximately $4.0 million.

Foreign Currency Exchange
We are exposed to foreign exchange rate changes of the Canadian and Mexican currencies as they impact the $141.6 million tangible and intangible net asset value of our Canadian and Mexican subsidiaries as of July 1, 2017. The foreign subsidiaries net tangible assets were $70.8 million and the net intangible assets were $70.8 million as of July 1, 2017.
We utilize foreign exchange forward contracts to manage the exposure to currency fluctuations in the Canadian dollar versus the U.S. Dollar. See "Note 9 - Derivatives and Hedging" of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Item 4.
Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective, as of July 1, 2017, in ensuring that material information required to be disclosed in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Exchange Act) that occurred during the thirteen weeks ended July 1, 2017 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.


Page 25 

PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. – Legal Proceedings.
We are subject to various claims and litigation that arise in the normal course of business. In the opinion of our management, the ultimate resolution of the pending litigation matters will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, operations, or cash flows.
Item 1A – Risk Factors.
There have been no material changes to the risks from those disclosed in Part I, Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.
Item 2. – Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
Not Applicable
Item 3. – Defaults Upon Senior Securities.
Not Applicable
Item 4. – Mine Safety Disclosures.
Not Applicable
Item 5. – Other Information.
Not Applicable

Page 26 

Item 6. – Exhibits.
a)
Exhibits, including those incorporated by reference.
31.1 *
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) under the Exchange Act
31.2 *
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) under the Exchange Act
32.1 *
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2 *
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
99.1 *
Supplemental Consolidating Guarantor and Non-Guarantor Financial Information
101
The following financial information from the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 1, 2017 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 11, 2017, formatted in eXtensible Business Reporting Language: (i) Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of July 1, 2017 and December 31, 2016, (ii) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended July 1, 2017 and the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, (iii) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the twenty-six weeks ended July 1, 2017 and the six months ended June 30, 2016, and (iv) Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
*
Filed herewith.
 


Page 27 

SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Exchange Act, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
THE HILLMAN COMPANIES, INC.
 
 
 
 
/s/    Jeffrey S. Leonard        
 
/s/    Nicholas P. Ruffing        
Jeffrey S. Leonard 
 
Nicholas P. Ruffing
Chief Financial Officer
 
Controller
 
 
(Chief Accounting Officer)
DATE: August 11, 2017


Page 28